Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 9

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 9, 2024.

Johto water dragon

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdra is never referred to as "Johto water dragon" at the target, making this an unlikely description and not a redirect that needs to be maintained. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Notched-Ear Pichu

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected after a 2009 AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notched-Ear Pichu. "Notch" not mentioned at the target, making this an unlikely and unhelpful search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. it's not even the right name. that one pichu that's stuck in gen 4 is called "spiky-eared pichu" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Contact Center as a Service

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate capitalization of two pages, Contact Center as a service, and Contact center as a service, the latter being a copy-paste of the former without attribution. The former was retargeted to the latter and deleted as G8, but this capitalization variant is still floating, and no longer discussed at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Canidae in Manipuri culture

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The AfD for the target Canidae in Meitei culture closed as merge to Meitei culture#Animals and birds, but the merge has not yet been done. The redirects may be looked afresh after the merge. Jay 💬 05:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous number of redirects for this article. This seems like an unlikely case for a redirect. PepperBeast (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note I've bundled these redirects that all had an identical rationale. Thryduulf (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having a lot of redirects to an article is absolutely not a problem in and of itself. Also note that the current target is nominated for detion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canidae in Meitei culture. As for what to do with these, I am neutral on the first few and the last one (ending "in Manipuri culture") as I think they would be fine if they ended "in Meitei culture" but I don't understand the context enough to know if this is equivalent, noting that Manipuri culture is a dab page. Keep Vixen in Meitei culture (discussed at target), Keep Canid in Meitei culture. Delete the rest (those beggining with "domestic dogs" and "hunting dogs") as there isn't really any discussion at the target about these. A7V2 (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Having a lot of redirects to an article is absolutely not a problem in and of itself It is when the author is very clearly just spamming redirects. The article itself should not even exist, never mind the ten thousand redirects. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, incredible there even needs to be a discussion about this. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Policy based rationale? Because this is textbook WP:IDONTLIKEIT. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMMONSENSE. Brusquedandelion (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah? Okay, how does deleting these make sense? You have to have some reason, even if it isn't based on policy. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all: Regardless of how the AfD turns out, these are possibly useful redirects that can be targeted to the merged section if the target is closed as merge/redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all : Those terms are English language synonymous terms of the important topics mentioned and discussed inside the article in varying degrees. For example, canidae, caninae, canids, canines, etc. are all scientifically as well as terminologically directly related as well as derivatives of one another. Those are zoological terms for the group of animals that consists of wolves, jackals and dogs. Vixen isn't an irrelevant term but a feminine gender of fox. Deletion isn't the solution. --Haoreima (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hui (animal)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 20#Hui (animal)

Vixen in Manipuri culture

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The AfD for the target Canidae in Meitei culture closed as merge to Meitei culture#Animals and birds, but the merge has not yet been done. The redirects may be looked afresh after the merge. Jay 💬 06:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous number of redirects for this article. PepperBeast (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pepperbeast: Could you please bundle these redirects since they're all pointed to the same location? Also, please be aware, "ridiculous number of redirects" is not a valid deletion rationale. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note. I've bundled these redirects to the same target with a near-identical nomination statement. Thryduulf (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Target does not mention wolf or wolves except as an item in a word list. Canis, caninae, and vixen seem like unlikely article searches. PepperBeast (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you serious? Not only should the redirects be deleted, but so too should the article they point too. This is just mind numbingly jobless behavior from some Manipuri nationalist. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Brusquedandelion and Pepperbeast: These are all discussed at the target, they are subtopics of "Canidae." Wolves, jackals, foxes, and Caninae are all canids. Obviously if the AfD returns a "delete" result then these should be deleted as broken redirects, but otherwise they are useful. So far neither of you have given any rationale for deleting these apart from WP:IDONTLIKEIT statements that make this nomination unhelpful and borderline-disruptive. Brusquedandelion, you call these redirects "spam", which makes no sense because they are discussed to varying degrees at the target, and you say that this is mind numbingly jobless behavior from some Manipuri nationalist, which is pretty much a WP:PA against Haoreima. I encourage you to strike that part of your comment.
Deleting these redirects would be a net decrease in the quality of the encyclopedia, and you still can't come up with policy-backed rationales for deleting them. WP:RPURPOSE clearly list Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Claiming the redirect should exist simply because they are discussed at the target is irrelevant given the target itself should not exist. Brusquedandelion (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then take that up at the deletion discussion. This is not a discussion about the article, this a discussion about these redirects on their independent merits. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But why? WP:COMMONSENSE suggests that I should absolutely use all information available to me in trying to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Brusquedandelion (talk) 01:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like you realize ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia article, right? Are you telling me if I follow this simple, two-step procedure, I can manufacture whichever redirects I wish?
  1. Edit the destination article to introduce whichever topic I wish.
  2. Manufacture a new redirect from the topic I introduced to the destination article.
I confess I am new to this site. But if you're sincerely telling me that Wikipedia has no safeguards against such a simple tactic- against this and others sorts of, well, frankly, jobless behavior by people with nothing better to do (let's call a spade a spade), how do Wikipedia admins get anything done at all? How are you not constantly just dealing with a river of mind-numbingly dull minutia?
Surely there's some safeguard against this. Brusquedandelion (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we do have policies on what sort of thing should be listed in articles, otherwise they would be, as you note, piles of minutiae and tangents. WP:DUE is one of the most salient, along with WP:TRIVIA and WP:SUMMARY 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, and take actions against the user spamming these redirects. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you believe these should be deleted? Thryduulf (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think there should be Wikipedia pages for X in Y culture, where X is any word for a species of animal, and Y is any culture? Obviously not. Brusquedandelion (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there is content about that species in that culture, it is likely a useful redirect. If there isn't it is likely not. Thryduulf (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Midnight Miracle

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 26#Midnight Miracle

Penguin pokemon

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete The article in the history could have been speedied as A10. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

adding here again, because i believe it's an implausible search, and also redundant because eiscue exists cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dexerto

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

current target is to an employee--not the founder or EIC, just an editor at large. Dexerto is only barely mentioned on the page. Alyo (chat·edits) 16:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete: I only suggest deleting redirects if I believe the redirect will cause more confusion than the value it brings. It seems clear to me Lewis is not the proper page to redirect to, it has only been chosen because there is no better article (e.g. a founder or parent company).Mokadoshi (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was looking to create an article about Dexerto/expanding Draft:Dexerto, a well-known publication. Makes 0 sense to be directed to a journalist.
TLA (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lati@s

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Cited as plausible search term. (non-admin closure) CaptainGalaxy 17:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. From some searching, it seems like it may be based on a meme about Latios and Latias, each one having a different gender, and "Lati@s" apparently being a play on that. Even if that weren't the case, I'd nominate this as a l33tspeak redirect that's unehlpful. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's mostly used in forums like gamefaqs to refer to them. otherwise, most people refer to them as the "eon duo" or forget that latias exists. support deletion cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I created it because it's a common nickname used by fans to refer to Latios and Latias collectively. Put me down for keep. Raymond1922 (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Raymond1922A: Then it becomes an issue of if there are multiple relevant targets, which one should be targeted? Hey man im josh (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i think it should be the first pokémon in the pokédex order, in this case latias cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Manhattan Raid

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has nothing to do with 9/11. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:46 a.m

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18#Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:46 a.m

September 11 airstrikes

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a series of airstrikes. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Terrorist attacks on New York, WA, and Pennsylvania

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless and confusable due to two reasons: A. PA was not an intended target and Flight 93 crashed there. and B. WA can also refer to the state. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's unlikely to switch using the full names, to the abbreviation for Washington, back to the full name for Pennsylvania. If created today it might be actionable. However, this redirect has existed since 2006, is typo-free, doesn't conflict with anything, and still is clear in its target. Weak Keep, probably, isn't doing much harm, unless there was another terrorist attack on those three places. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible. As Utopes says above, it is very unlikely that anyone would search for the full state name, an abbreviation, and a full state name. But more to the point, it wasn't Washington state that was targeted, it was DC (or to be more precise, Virginia). I would agree with Utopes if the abbreviation were VA or DC, but it isn't. WA is unambiguously the state abbreviation of the Pacific Northwest state, and is clearly incorrect, as opposed to the redirect Terrorist attacks on New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania, which is plausible as "Washington" is ambiguous. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Epicgenius because WA is clearly incorrect. Jay 💬 17:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2001 New York attacks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Unanimous to keep and then withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the attacks DID happen in New York, it is not a common name or search term, so I suggest Delete. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and withdrawn It's plausible. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

GOOMY

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#GOOMY

Dialga the temporal pokemon

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible search, created as fancruft cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Dialga on its own already gets you to List of generation IV Pokémon#Dialga. I can think of no reason why a fan would search for this full title without first searching for the name on its own. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 00:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shiny Dialga

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible search cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Arueus

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Arueus

Dialaga

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Dialaga

ROADSCHOOLING!

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete' per WP:CSD#G7. The nominator is the only contributor. Thryduulf (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect, I initially made this because of a YouTube video that I laughed at, but it's not mentioned in the main article. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

RegiKing

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 17:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yet another fake fakemon page turned redirect cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jirachio

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo, created as either vandalism or a weird fanfic cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Toetchic

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Toetchic

Terchic

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Terchic

Torshic

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Torshic

Mud Fish Pokémon

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible everything cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fuzzy Tree

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Fuzzy Tree

Celebi: The Legendary Pokemon

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible search, minor spelling mistake, and also wrong category cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Teddiursla

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo...? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sneasel EX

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Sneasel EX

Shukle

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Shukle

Red Lightning (Pokémon)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

who calls it that? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chikoritas

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 15:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible pluralization cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pichu Pokemon Nintendo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nonsense, seemingly created as nonsense. wikipedia website wikimedia cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Torichc

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo and wrong pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Venusaurs

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 15:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible pluralization cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

GENWUNNER

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WRONG TARGET I THINK, ALSO WHY IS IT IN ALL CAPS cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • DELETER, the extra letters added to the end make this more of an association with the meme, and even less of a helpful redirect. Turning "gen wun" into an agent noun, a la "someone who gen wuns", is even more implausible for not being a Wikipedia topic. Neither "Genwun" or "Genwunner" appear anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "GENWUN" sounds like "Gen one", as in "generation 1". The target seems intentional, but is it helpful/likely? Steel1943 (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943, per https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/genwunner it probably is. See also wikt:genwunner. This seems like the correct target, and alternate capitalization is not a reason to delete a redirect. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(re Steel at first, later turns into re:Waid from wiktionary) Yes, under the GENWUN RfD I mentioned that "genwun" was the phonetic spelling of "gen 1", also alongside the Know Your Meme page, although I probably should've highlighted this here as well. The current target is definitely intentional due to "genwunner" being a Pokemon meme associated with Pokemon's first gen. At the end of the day though, this meme is not covered, or even acknowledged, anywhere on Wikipedia (between both "genwun" and "genwunner"). There's no on-Wikipedia-justification for targeting a meme-word meaning: "Someone who likes only the first generation of the Pokémon franchise", to the respective list of Pokemon from that generation, and would leave readers that use this term confused without a mention of what they were looking for. I'm shocked to learn that there's a wiktionary page for this made-up slang, but pointing it as a soft redirect to Wikt:genwunner is far better than the status quo. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

GENWUN

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WHY IS IT IN ALL CAPS cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shiny Pidgey

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible search cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pleck, Forne, Sherborne, Dorset

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pleck Green is in Holwell, and it's unclear what "Forne" refers to. Google search for Pleck, Forne and Dorset only finds a book about place names in Herefordshire where a place called Forne in the Domesday Book is said to be possibly the same as Ford, Herefordshire. Peter James (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The cute little Aurora Beamer

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

funny, but alolan vulpix is cuter cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Misty's Dewgong

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

non-notable within the context of the list cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dugong (Pokémon)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible search? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above rationale - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉(talk|contributions) 07:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aqua Ring

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aquarium of Genoa#Conservation. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aqua Tail

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

someone really really likes seel in particular cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aurora Beam

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to November 1882 geomagnetic storm#Capron's beam. Jay 💬 16:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...why? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dewgong the dugong

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uh huh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Seel the seal

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uh huh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dratini and Dragonair

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Dratini and Dragonair

Pokemon hitmonlee

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Pokemon hitmonlee

Caterpie, Metapod and Butterfree

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copy of another redirect without the oxford comma cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Qbone

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible spelling cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Secure Transport

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18#Secure Transport

Failtorb

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Electrode(pokemon)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete No consensus to move, no real need to as the history has no substantive content. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

minor writing mistake, and minor spelling mistake too cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alakhazam

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Alakazam. Jay 💬 17:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo and wrong pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Seels

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Seels

Aero (Aerodactyl)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have no idea what the purpose of this is supposed to be cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

correction: it was initially about an aerodactyl in a manga. not very notable cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't get this one. TarkusABtalk/contrib 02:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No idea. Someone's nickname for their own Aerodactyl maybe? ;) Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gravelers

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible pluralization cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Likitung

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible minor spelling mistake cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Saidon (pokémon)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Saidon (pokémon)

Horsea, Seadra, Kingra

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

minor spelling mistake cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A basic type-o redirect. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Polygonz

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Polygonz

PolygonZ

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of generation IV Pokémon#Porygon-Z. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo, and wrong pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hill Climb Racing 2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The Hill Climb Racing 2 sequel is mentioned in the lead section; there is insufficient content to justify a separate article, and well, we don't want to disappoint readers who might want to search for the sequel. A separate article may be created in the future if and when content justifies that. If someone wants to make it a section link, OK, but just linking to the top avoids this stupid issue recurring in the future. wbm1058 (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section doesn't exist anymore, so will this page be reverted to this revision? 176.33.241.125 (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore and send to AfD as it seems there is a dispute about whether this is notable or not and AfD is the place to get consensus about that. Thryduulf (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Hill Climb Racing#Sequels where it is mentioned. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thryduulf: Pinging you since I'm assuming you overlooked that mention. Steel1943 (talk) 23:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't overlook the mention, it's just not relevant because the page history shows a dispute over whether this should be an article or a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough. Either way, I'm going to stick with my stance because I don't think the nominator noticed the mention or is questioning the notability. The target I referenced directs readers to where the subject is mentioned and identified. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand why you think the existence of the dispute isn't relevant? If this is notable then there should be a disambig or hatnote, if it isn't then we can consider whether the title should redirect and if so where to. Thryduulf (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ...Because it seems obvious the nominator doesn't see the dispute as relevant enough to take to AFD either, and most likely just overlooked the fact that the section name got changed from "Sequel" to "Sequels" and then started this discussion. That, and if it's notable, someone who knows how Wikipedia works will eventually try to revive an article again at this title. Either way, per the edit history, the multiple WP:BLARs happened almost instantaneously after the content was created (1st BLAR occurred a week after the article was created in 2016, and the 2nd BLAR happened a day after content was reestablished in he middle of 2021), so I rarely say this but ... I think AFD in this case would be a time waster. This redirect has been a redirect consistently for about 2.5 years now, and before that it was a redirect for about 4.5 years ... I think what we got is the best we are gonna get. Steel1943 (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If the page is restored, I think anyone will suggest a retarget if it will not be expanded. If still not, please speedy close this discussion as retarget, so I could withdraw it. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix the target to the plural per Steel. The section exists. Jay 💬 11:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Glacia (Eon)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo (this is a typo, right?) and wrong pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PorigonZ

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of generation IV Pokémon#Porygon-Z. Complex/Rational 17:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible typo and wrong pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mew Glith

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

minor spelling mistake cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have never seen anyone referring to Mew as Mew Glith - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉(talk|contributions) 16:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it's actually a typo of "mew glitch", basically an umbrella term for like 5 different-ish glitches used to catch mew
still implausible, probably cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jewish Nazis

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Most participants seem to agree that there could be a legitimate use of this term, but it's not one we can deliver on currently. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the rationale used when targeting this page to its target, but I'm not sure if this is useful and/or helpful. The target does not describe the members as "Jewish Nazis" verbatim, which leads me to believe that further eyes on this redirect may be warranted. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this is a term that gets lots of hits in a variety of reliable (and unreliable) sources, but it isn't consistently used to refer to a single topic. Referents include various WWII-era pro-Nazi Jewish people/organisations/ideologies, Jewish people/organisations that collaborated with Nazi Germany (not necessarily voluntarily), Jewish people that espoused/practised ideologies similar to WWII-era Nazis post-WWII (e.g. in Apartheid South Africa), Jewish people/organisations that espouse/practice behaviour towards (especially) Palestinians that is/are/are alleged to be comparable to the way people/organisations in Nazi Germany acted towards Jews, and in relation to conspiracy theories about Jews (I haven't looked to see if this is just an epithet, an analogy, literal accusation or a mixture). So in summary, I think the current target is not wrong per se, but too narrow, and there probably should be something at this title although I'm unsure if that's an article, a broad concept or a set index. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brumak

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Retarget to Gears of War (video game)#Ports as the only suggestion that came up, and no support for the status quo. Jay 💬 17:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect with some history that once targeted a list of Gears of War characters (that has since been converted into a redirect), this character receives some mention on various Gears of War related articles..... NONE of which, I should say, are the main Gears of War article itself (not to mention the Settings section which has since been removed). It's clear that this current target is not helpful due to no presence on the page, but is there an alternative? Or delete? Utopes (talk / cont) 03:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged with "R from merge".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 09:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quote that isn't mentioned at the target article in any capacity, making this an unhelpful and confusing redirect. "Cookie" appears only in the footer for Wikipedia's "Cookie Statement"... Utopes (talk / cont) 09:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Our princess is in another castle

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Our princess is in another castle!. Cool article, withdrawing & speedy retarget now that it exists. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 05:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article, not a helpful redirect out of context as we don't have any information about this quote, leaving readers stranded when they arrive. The Mario Wiki is more fitting for this material. Utopes (talk / cont) 09:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it's actually used in the video game. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Google YouTube

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Refine to YouTube#"Broadcast Yourself" era (2006–2013). Jay 💬 09:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful WP:XY redirect, both articles mention both names to begin with, and does not seem to have any helpful use-cases. Utopes (talk / cont) 09:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ubiquitous

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participants considered all suggestions of the nomination. While there was support for wiktionary from more than one participant, there was opposition as well. As the current target was deleted, and there was no support foe deleting this redirect, retargeting to Omnipresence, also the previous target, as an alternative. Jay 💬 17:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page was originally targeted towards Omnipresence.

Ubiquitous (adjective) was created by Starlighsky as they wanted it to explain the dictionary definition. (WP:NOT issues) They'd probably would like a redirect to Wikitionary instead.

It could also redirect to Ubiquity or serve as its own disambig ([1]) Justiyaya 11:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think targeting Ubiquity would be odd and a borderline WP:ASTONISH violation, since none of the entries on that dab page are relevant to the meaning or usage of the adjective ubiquitous. The only thing relevant on that page is the link to Wiktionary's ubiquity page, which is less informative than a direct link to its ubiquitous page would be. Deor (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk pages. Note that the current target was deleted as an outcome of its target's AfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with soft redirect to wikt. From my search, creating a dab page with the title "ubiquitous", would be a violation of WP:PARTIAL. Wikt explains the term and provides the best benefit to the readers. Ca talk to me! 05:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

New Soup

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname not mentioned at the target article, vague and unhelpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 09:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. it's a good way to find the relaxalax fans lurking around, but not really helpful in any way, shape, form, or a fourth thing actually related to wikipedia cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Woke agenda

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#Woke agenda

CCFL inverter

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#CCFL inverter

Failed wannabe star

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the edit summary, brown dwarfs were called by this name in one Youtube video, to which I presume this became a local meme in the associated community. The various meanings of the word "star" aside, not a synonym nor a likely search term for the subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ketel Marte's 19-game post-season hitting streak

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 12:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an 18-game and 20-game version of this redirect, the contents of which merged into the main article following a deletion discussion in this AfD. Despite neither being likely search terms, the 19 version has no relevant history as an in-between move, and also is not mentioned at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Second Cold War inn the Middle East

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 12:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New redirect with unlikely spelling of "inn". I don't foresee this having inn-y benefit. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Secure transport company

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "secure" at the target article. I'd hope that ALL transport companies are "secure", which is what comes up when searching google (just transport). A lack of any youth connotation could make this target a WP:SURPRISE for searchers. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Airport MRT station

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of airport stations. There is a consensus against deletion, and List of airport stations has received the most support among targets which can disambiguate the title. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several different Airport MRT stations that this title may refer to. This partial title match is often shared with other stations, and would otherwise be a generic title which can confuse readers, just as it confused me. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of proposed target "Airport station".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of airport stations per thryduulf (talk · contribs) - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉(talk|contributions) 17:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Play of Saint Lawrence

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. None of these redirects actually had history, but withdrawing now that an article exists at this title. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 03:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, not a very helpful redirect pointed at a page for a language. The edit summary of just a URL does not help as much as required, given that I'm left still confused. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Orthodox Muslim

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Orthodoxy#Islam. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure this is unambiguous, and the redirect could create bias if not. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 07:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Orthodox Islam

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Orthodoxy#Islam. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure this is unambiguous. While Orthodoxy#Islam claims it could refer to Sunni Islam, the edit summary in changing this redirect target seems non-neutral. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 07:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Marathi Medium

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Marathi Medium

John Xina

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same reasons as the deletion for Zhong xina brought about by this discussion; refers to a meme no longer covered at the target. This case does use the name "John", but still feels unlikely, even if somewhat closer. The lowercase has some history, but I don't foresee it ever being utilized given the nature of it. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2024 GOP

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There's no consensus to delete; while delete !voters argued that this incomplete term could refer to any number of 2024 things in the Republican Party, and search results would do best, while keep !voters argued that searches for this term mostly returned results about the primaries, making it a plausible redirect. There was some support for retargeting, however not enough to form a consensus to retarget. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts she/theytalk/stalk 15:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of things are happening in the Republican Party in 2024, not just the primaries. If I had to pick a target it would be History of the Republican Party (United States) § The Biden years: 2021–present, but I don't really think this is a plausible search term. So, delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 03:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Couldn't disagree more. Make a Google search using the terms "2024 GOP." It's nothing but articles discussing the primaries. As plausible as it gets. That's why I even added the redirect. TheCelebrinator (talk) 05:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as seems to point to the right target, seems plausible enough. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 10:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep try typing it into google and see what comes up. Scu ba (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Google and Wikipedia handle searches differently. Google is trying to find webpages (particularly recent ones) most associated with the words you search. For "2024 GOP", sure, that's the 2024 GOP primaries. That doesn't mean that, for Wikipedia's purposes, "2024 GOP" is a term used to refer to the GOP primaries. What we care about is search terms that could plausibly refer to the article's subject or to a concept discussed in an article. Unlike Google, we don't give someone a results list when there's a redirect; we confidently tell them, "This is what you meant". And we can't confidently assert that here, because "2024 GOP" already means something else: the Republican Party as exists in 2024 (as in "the 2024 GOP cares a lot about immigration"). It does not mean, and has never meant, the 2024 Republican primaries. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 20:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per TheCelebrinator and Alextejithompson. It's clear that the primary topic for people using this search term is the 2024 GOP primaries, it's also clear that it is a plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thryduulf: Can you point to any sources actually using this term to refer to the primaries themselves? This isn't something like Euro 2024 that's a common shortening of a longer name. It's just the first two words of 2024 GOP primaries, which is why it comes up in search results. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 23:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As this is not a request to move the page to that title, that isn't relevant. There are only two questions that are relevant: 1. is this a plausible search term, and 2. if so, what is the best target for a redirect from this title. The answer to question 1 is "yes" - we have evidence above to that effect. The answer to 2 is unquestionably the current target. Thryduulf (talk) 00:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course it's relevant, Thryduulf. We do not keep redirects that are just an arbitrary fragment of a name for something, simply because Google associates that fragment with its whole. Would we redirect 2024 Summer to 2024 Summer Olympics? Most Google results for it are about just that. 96th Academy to 96th Academy Awards? Same thing there. If no sources refer to the primaries as "2024 GOP", then that is not just relevant here, it is the only thing that is relevant here. So again, I ask that someone show sources that anyone other than TheCelebrinator uses this term this way. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 02:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed we don't keep arbitrary fragments when they aren't useful and/or don't have a single clear target. e.g. the first page of Google hits for "2024 summer" is dominated by results for summer holidays (a mix of ideas and people wanting me to buy a holiday from them) but also includes the Olympics, Paralympics and fashion trends. While "96th Academy" does have a primary topic (in the Oscars) it's not a plausible search term imo as it lacks any nouns (although if anyone presents data to contradict this I'll be happy to change my mind). We have actual evidence above that people regard "2024 GOP" as a useful search term, and no evidence of harm so WP:WR#KEEP point 5 applies. Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    From my geolocation, at least, the incognito Google results for "2024 Summer" are almost entirely about the Olympics. And no, we don't have evidence that people find it a useful search term. We have evidence that people Googled it and that Google took them to pages about this topic. No one here has actually said that this is something that they or anyone they know would ever expect to redirect to the current target. Because it isn't. It's nonsensical. It makes as much sense as targeting October 2022 Conservative Party to October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election. As to evidence of harm? Sure. Yet again, this literally means something else. It's just that it's a fragment of a more common phrase so it doesn't come up as high in search results... much as the primary meaning of "2024 Summer" is the summer of 2024, even if Google thinks it's the Olympics. Here is an RS opinion article using "2024 GOP" to refer to the Republican Party in 2024. Here it was used in the pre-clickthrough headline for this RS article. Here [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] is usage by various bloggers or commenters. Meanwhile we're still at 0 sources using the term to refer to the Republican primaries, and I have not found any such sources, reliable or otherwise, in my research. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 18:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 06:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Deep state in Russia

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 00:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No longer mentioned at target, although Deep state § Chechnya is there, so we could retarget there? Or just delete. QueenofHearts 06:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ai tool

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by Widr 3 minutes after nomination. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had an edit war with CycloneYoris over this. In short: Bhawaybhalla6 (who seems to only be here for spam, by the way) wrote a spammy/promotional article about AI tools at this title; CycloneYoris nominated it for speedy deletion per CSD G11; I noticed this page and redirected it to Artificial intelligence because it seemed like a plausible search term; CycloneYoris undid my edit, stating unnecessary. Please let an admin delete this. We don't want spam hidden in any page history.; finally, I undid his edit because I still thought that "Ai tool" was a plausible search term anyways. But I don't want to edit war, so to RfD I go instead. Duckmather (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

NORF

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#NORF

Norf

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16#Norf

T:R from

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not often linked to like T:DYK or T:ITN, doesn't need an XNR. Previously nominated in a batch at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 18#T:WPTECH and closed as no consensus, every single redirect there has been deleted in later separate noms except this one. QueenofHearts 04:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's also T:ONES and T:SINGLE, but I agree to delete this. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hilda Murray (Q18954256)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Title was moved from another title seemingly created by mistake. Deauthorized. (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: one link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality/United Kingdom would need to be fixed. I would do it myself but my tab keeps freezing when I try to edit the page. Deauthorized. (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_9&oldid=1214033564"