Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 December 3
< December 2 | December 4 > |
---|
December 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SA Barfence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded 2 December as a promotional file listing Otto Saskia as photographer and listed as part of the subject's promotional packet.. Now suddently it's become a CC 3.0 file with no input from Saskia. We hope (talk) 00:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Creator is initially listed as Saskia; uploader says rights belong to subject and this is the only photo he wishes to use for his WP article. There is no Commons file at the template link. It appears that uploader is connected with the subject and that this is not a free file.We hope (talk) 00:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unclear lincensing and this can be replaced with a free image so a non-free use rationale is invalid. De728631 (talk) 23:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AGDBadge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of fraternity pin. GrapedApe (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Akpsi-badge.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of fraternity pin GrapedApe (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Crownbadge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the pin was actually created in 1907 as claimed.GrapedApe (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a novel idea, actually look at the references for the use of the image and stop using a bot to make you look better. The article where the image is used references where the image came from and the date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piep314 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eastbadge.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the pin was actually created in 1906 as claimed GrapedApe (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a novel idea, actually look at the references for the use of the image and stop using a bot to make you look better. The article where the image is used references where the image came from and the date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piep314 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KDPin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a fraternity pin GrapedApe (talk) 18:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SAIota Members.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a fraternity pin GrapedApe (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sdt badge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of a fraternity pin GrapedApe (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1stbadge.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence this pin was created in 1896 GrapedApe (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a novel idea, actually look at the references for the use of the image and stop using a bot to make you look better. The article where the image is used references where the image came from and the date.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PiMuCrest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence this pin was created in 1892 GrapedApe (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a novel idea, actually look at the references for the use of the image and stop using a bot to make you look better. The article where the image is used references where the image came from and the date.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PhiChiPledgepin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence this pin was created in 1920 GrapedApe (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a novel idea, actually look at the references for the use of the image and stop using a bot to make you look better. The article where the image is used references where the image came from and the date.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Founders.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Just look at the file history of this image. Wow. GrapedApe (talk) 19:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unused image with a title that makes it prone for that kind of obvious misuse. De728631 (talk) 23:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Low resolution, strange border around the image, probably taken from here. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: That is indeed the identical image resolution to this one, so copyright most likely belongs to the school and not the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 07:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Holy crap, it is! Anybody willing to go to Manhasset in order to get a legal replacement? ----DanTD (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.