Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 8
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dacian draco.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No information on original source or evidence this was released under a free license; also nominated for deletion on Commons —innotata 01:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but fix license. I think this image is very important for the Dacian Draco article, as is one of the best depictions we have. I don't know the origin but if I am not mistaken, it seems to be the same with the one on Romanian 5000 lei bill. So maybe a derivation? Alternatively, I think this should be a reasonable case for fair use and the license could be updated accordingly. --Codrin.B (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP. I found the image some years ago on the internet, and I taught that it is free of comyright because of the following reasons: First: this is an image of an aincent heraldric/vexilological symbol of the Dacians. I find that to be free of comiright. Second: it is an image of an element found on a former romanian banknote (5000 lei) (still free of copyright). Three: it is an image that reproduces part of a current heraldric symbol, the Coat of arms of Cluj-Napoca. --ES Vic (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We need to know where this illustration was originally published with some certainty to know its copyright status; I'd expect this to be easily replaceable. —innotata 23:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The draco's image we are talking is only a drawing that could be considered too simple to be copyrighted: The pole is missing, Colours are missing so that Draco’s materials (bronze and silk can not be seen) Compare with a reconstructed Dacian draco http://cuibus.ro/blog/lupul-dacic-vazut-de-terra-dacica-aeterna.html Boldwin (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not by any stretch of the imagination ineligible for copyright, anywhere. It's more than simple geometric shapes, little bits of text, or anything like that. —innotata 13:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Steve Charles wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: uploader claims to be the author of this TV screenshot attributed to a Nashville Now TV show but there is no evidence the TV company has released the image under a public domain licence so the uploader's claim appears false. ww2censor (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Past discussions have concluded that Photobucket images are not compatibly licensed; main concerns have been that their terms of use do not allow commercial re-use (discussion at Commons) and that the permission may be revocable (discussion at MCQ). January (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:John Cena 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same reason as for File:The Miz as WWE Champion.jpg above. January (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WM27Rock5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same reason as for File:The Miz as WWE Champion.jpg above. January (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete - deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-in-library.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per this message the uploader left me at my talk page, these images might not be available freely. The uploader claims that permission has been given for use on Wikipedia, however, and therefore I believe a copyright solution can be worked out. However, if not, the images are copyright infringement from [1]. lifebaka++ 21:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 April 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Company logo Eeekster (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please close: This company logo being used in infobox of article about the company and now has proper fully completed fair-use rational and proper licence. I have removed the now redundant puf tag. ww2censor (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
used in the article Eric I, Duke of Brunswick-Luneberg; the source of original photo of painting is at the following locale - http://www.welfen.de/erichi1.htm. Although, the original painting has had a copyright expiration, apparently the photo [[Erich Elisabeth.jpg] is protected by copyright when you go to the website... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.