Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ziggy Sawdust/Avril

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ziggy Sawdust/Avril

Clearly using Wikipedia as web space. Just a bunch of stupid fan questions from users with salted talk pages, also was created by User:Youlipo but on User:Ziggy Sawdust's userspace. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wow, and look at all the questions that are on it. I have no idea what this is doing on Wikipedia. Mm 40 (talk | contribs) 19:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete According to our guideline on user space the user space serves two main functions. The first is to be a tool to organize the work you are doing on wikipedia, and the second purpose is to give people a general understanding of who you are. The user space is not to be used as a blog, webspace provider, etc. This page isn't appropriate according to that guideline. Some circumstances could warrant us to go about this in a more "friendly" way, however, the creator of this has shown no intent to actually help the project, thus this circumstance doesn't warrant us to bend this guideline.--SJP (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and possibly consider it as a speedy deletion because it is the user space of a banned user's sockpuppet. Metros (talk) 00:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
blank and protect. Banned user page with other's contributions. No need to delete (and hide others contributions). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless and unencyclopedic. Individual sub pages shouldn't need to be kept around for historical purposes unless they are serving as some sort of reference, and this clearly is not. — _Maggot^Syn 10:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just so the context is clear, this page was part of an effort to draw trolls away from the Reference Desks, and I believe it was created in good faith as a sort of containment strategy. -- Coneslayer (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a troll playground in the userspace of a banned user, breaks WP:DENY. Hut 8.5 19:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and speedy close. This should be deleted under CSD G5. miranda 00:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A G5 speedy tag has already been declined - many users other than Ziggy Sawdust have made substantial edits to the page. Hut 8.5 06:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unencyclopedic. The trolling seems to be over, so there's no reason to keep it. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 00:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.