Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 12

< February 11	February 13 >

February 12

File:National Bloc White Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Whpq (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. I was just trying to figure out how to make a mass nomination for a number of these when I saw that Magog the Ogre got there before me. Felix QW (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kata'ib Hezbollah flag.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. With only one non-free image usable for identification and File:Kata'ib Hezbollah logo.svg having an editor recommend relicense (see below), this image will be deleted instead of conversion to non-free use. Whpq (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One could probably keep either the flag or the logo as non-free use on the main article of the group, but should delete the other one and remove the remaining image from the many other pages on which these are currently displayed. Felix QW (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kata'ib Hezbollah logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free only for the Kata'ib Hezbollah article. Whpq (talk) 19:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use for Kata'ib Hezbollah. Remove from all other articles. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Islamic Army of Iraq (emblem).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not in use on the Islamic Army of Iraq page, which would be the only place where non-free use could be considered. Felix QW (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo of the Supreme Command for Jihad and Liberation.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free only for Supreme Command for Jihad and Liberation. Whpq (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense as non-free for use on the main article of the group. Remove elsewhere. Felix QW (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of the Abu al-Fadl al-Abbas Forces.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Given that an editor opined that either the flag or logo is ok and (see below) there another opinion to relicense the logo, then delete this flag in favour of using the logo as non-free. Whpq (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense either flag or SSI as non-free for use on the main article of the group. Remove elsewhere and delete the remaining one. Felix QW (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SSI of the Abu al-Fadl al-Abbas Forces.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free only for Abu al-Fadl al-Abbas Forces. Whpq (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use for Abu al-Fadl al-Abbas Forces. Remove from user space. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Popular Mobilization Forces (Iraq) logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this as not in use at Popular Mobilisation Forces. Felix QW (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sinjar Restistance Units flag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neither free nor in use. Felix QW (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Popular mobilization forces flag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, unclear copyright status. -FASTILY 00:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This one might be near the threshold of originality, but unfortunately we have no information on where the threshold lies in Iraqi law. Felix QW (talk) 21:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If we do not consider it to be free, we should delete it as File:Hashd Al-Sha'abi flag.svg is in use at the group's article instead of this version. Felix QW (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No opinion on this particular image. @Felix QW:, English Wikipedia follows the US threshold of originality, regardless of the image's country of origin. Wikiacc (¶) 02:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that we usually do, but I think that is because we follow US copyright law, with other countries' laws coming into play only through the URAA and therefore still require being copyrightable as such. To me this does not make sense in a case like this, when we extraordinarily decide to follow Iraqi coopyright law in its entirety because Iraq has not signed the Berne convention. Felix QW (talk) 08:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jaish al-Mujahideen logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 00:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense as non-free for use on the main article of the group. Remove elsewhere. Felix QW (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISCI flag.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free only for Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq. Whpq (talk) 13:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense as non-free for use on the main article of the group. Remove elsewhere. Felix QW (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EN Bank logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, unclear copyright status. -FASTILY 00:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia honors the copyrights of non-Berne signatories. As such, the license tag on this page is wrong. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the US, this would likely be below the threshold of originality. However, according to Commons guidance the threshold of originality in Iran is very low, so we should probably delete this. Felix QW (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia follows the US threshold of originality, regardless of the country of origin. Wikiacc (¶) 02:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that we usually do, but I think that is because we follow US copyright law, with other countries' laws coming into play only through the URAA and therefore still require being copyrightable as such. To me this does not make sense in a case like this, when we extraordinarily decide to follow Irani coopyright law in its entirety because Iran has not signed the Berne convention. Felix QW (talk) 08:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TCRP3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of presumably copyrighted banner, which is likely too prominent to be considered de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reichstag flag original.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure how to approach this one, but Commons recently kept c:File:Raising a flag over the Reichstag 2.jpg following a deletion request and a discussion at the Commons Village Pump for copyright. If we trust Commons' judgement here, this file is free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Red army soldiers raising the soviet flag on the roof of the reichstag with two Watchs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure how to approach this one, but Commons recently kept c:File:Raising a flag over the Reichstag 2.jpg following a deletion request and a discussion at the Commons Village Pump for copyright. If we trust Commons' judgement here, the original photo is free, so this derivative work could be replaced with a newly created freely licensed file that shows a zoom-in on the two wristwatches. As such, if we trust Commons, this photo is replaceable and should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnDoughAndTheCherub.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This book cover image is taken from a facsimile publisher and is used in the book's article as a depiction of the 1906 first edition cover. In that case it would be PD due to age. However, an actual first edition book can be seen here, with a very different cover. This puts the PD claim in doubt, and also makes the fair use questionable since the 1906 original would be a free alternative. Felix QW (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.