Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 October 3

< October 2	October 4 >

October 3

File:Ziva and Eli David From NCIS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 Werieth (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Koren Sacks Siddur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved image to Koren Siddur. Diannaa (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it passes WP:NFCC#8. In common use of prayer books, distinctive visual identity often used more than the proper title to distinguish given that they all share the same colloquial title, siddur. Joe407 (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- See the footnote to WP:NFCI §1: book covers are inappropriate in the article about the author of the book. The same obviously also applies if the book is used in the article about the publishing house. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is discussion is regarding the image. You raise a separate point that perhaps the image should not be used on the publishing house page. I'm not familiar with that question to comment. Joe407 (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - When the file was nominated for deletion, it was only used in the article Koren Publishers Jerusalem. It appears that it has since been added to the article Siddur, where the image violates WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.