Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 17

< July 16	July 18 >

July 17

File:Kiss Me Thru the Phone UK cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiss Me Thru the Phone UK cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs).

Image fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple covers are being used when one would suffice. This image does not convey significant information that would improve the readers' understanding of the subject. — Σxplicit 04:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CCRayS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CCRayS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ChefRski (notify | contribs).

Advert image. MBisanz ^talk 06:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2C-TFM.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2C-TFM.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Morninggloryseed (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2CB.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2CB.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russell E (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2CE.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2CE.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russell E (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2CI.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2CI.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russell E (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2CT2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2CT2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russell E (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2CT7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2CT7.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Russell E (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3-Amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-Amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dendre (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosuvastatin.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosuvastatin.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jfdwolff (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tazarotene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tazarotene.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dakoman (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peek.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peek.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dflanagan (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boron-trichloride-chemical.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boron-trichloride-chemical.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stone (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Calcium Hexaboride.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calcium Hexaboride.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sydlisy19 (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by a superior image. —harej (talk) (cool!) 09:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baldwin debate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baldwin debate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by William S. Saturn (notify | contribs).

Rationale states that the image is "to demonstrate baldwin's participation in the third party presidential debate". I fail to see why a non-free image is required for that. The debate is discussed in the article, but how Baldwin looked while taking part in the debate is not, and is not of any real importance. J Milburn (talk) 12:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Third party debate participation is extremely important. Plus, no free equivalent of Baldwin during the campaign exists. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not dispute the importance of the debate or the fact that this could not be replaced (I doubt that it is irreplaceable, but I am happy to defer to you on that issue). I am talking about non-free content criterion 8. This image adds nothing to the article. J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob Barr on Fox News.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob Barr on Fox News.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by William S. Saturn (notify | contribs).

The rationale states that this image is "to show Bob Barr on Fox News". The fact he talked on Fox News is mentioned, but there is no clear reason that a reader would need an image to help visualise this. Per non-free content criterion 8, this image adds little to the article, and should be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To show the viewers the attitude of Barr on Fox News, cannot be explained in text. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does it need to be shown? What exactly is it showing, and what point in the text is it illustrating? J Milburn (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, yes. Fox News attitude versus Libertarian candidates. Not even using the proper host of the show. --William S. Saturn (talk) 23:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dodd december debate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dodd december debate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by William S. Saturn (notify | contribs).

The rationale states that this image is "to illustrate dodd's participation in the final Democratic debate before the Iowa Caucus", but I fail to see why this needs to be illustrated. The debate is briefly discussed, but that does not mean we are justified in using a non-free image to illustrate it. This image does not seem to be showing anything in particular. J Milburn (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Used for a month by month basis to show how the campaign took its toll on Dodd. No free equivalent for the month. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is with non-free content criterion 8- what is this image actually adding to the article? Using a non-free image to simply decorate the coverage of a certain month is not acceptable. J Milburn (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Rationale clearly stated above. "Decorative" is not used in the rationale. --William S. Saturn (talk) 23:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dodd november debate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dodd november debate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by William S. Saturn (notify | contribs).

This image is apparently "to illustrate dodd's participation in the debate". Though the debate is discussed briefly, how he looked during the debate is of no importance. This image adds nothing to the article in which it is used. J Milburn (talk) 12:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Used for a month by month basis to show how the campaign took its toll on Dodd. No free equivalent for the month. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is with non-free content criterion 8- what is this image actually adding to the article? Using a non-free image to simply decorate the coverage of a certain month is not acceptable. J Milburn (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Rationale clearly stated above. "Decorative" is not used in the rationale.--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aryavarta wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aryavarta wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RussellSpence (notify | contribs).

The image is nothing more than original research, presenting a particular non-neutral point of view that is being liberally applied on a variety of garden topics. The image's summary also contains a legal threat of prosecution if so modified. We don't allow original research as text, and we certainly do not allow it as an image. seicer | talk | contribs 16:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The modification clause was removed based on advice from other members. However, this is not original research. In fact this is based on the latest genetics research of SE Asian population and human migrations, as well as latest research on the Indus Script. All these topics are well discussed and settled in Wikipedia itself. Please do not delete this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RussellSpence (talk • contribs) 16:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is still a legal threat on the page, which must be removed forthwith or you'll be blocked. Our guidelines say "user-created images should not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use". If it can't be modified according to our Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License it will be deleted. (In fact, it should be deleted simply because of the copyright notice/watermark). Dougweller (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Dougweller; if a version of this map without wording inconsistent with the required licensing we can revisit the issues presented by the nom about accuracy/OR, etc. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research, and Indef-block the user if he does not immediately withdraw anything resembling legal threats. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 18:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - uploaded license clearly incompatible with creators wishes and the copyright tag embedded into image. Canterbury Tail talk 18:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete as unencyclopedic nonsense, never mind licence issues. --dab (𒁳) 19:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dougweller and the clearly visible copyright imprint. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dougweller and Baseball Bugs. javért | ^talk 19:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bravo Band - Intro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). — Σxplicit 03:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bravo Band - Intro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 1111tomica (notify | contribs).

The album cover is used in the band's infobox without critical commentary against "The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art" from the fair use agreement, against "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question" from the licensing agreement and against Wikipedia:Non-free content. Aspects (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to withdraw this nomination that it is no longer being used in the band's infobox and instead is being used in the newly created album article. Aspects (talk) 03:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, use on the album article seems legitimate. J Milburn (talk) 22:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BarneyCollier.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BarneyCollier.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HenryPage23 (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used in a list article, character is already identified in the article by this cast image File:IMF Seasons 2-3 Cast.jpg. This image is therefore decorative and superfluous. Polly (Parrot) 20:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madonna22.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madonna22.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ElPilotoDi (notify | contribs).

What she looked like while performing the song on a certain tour is not important. (On an unrelated note, is that really her?) J Milburn (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This image is now orphaned and has been tagged as such.--Rockfang (talk) 20:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Virgin Tour 1985.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Virgin Tour 1985.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ElPilotoDi (notify | contribs).

What Madonna looked like on the tour is not of importance. The use of this non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 22:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonny and Carly Corinthos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonny and Carly Corinthos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leslie Roak (notify | contribs).

I fail to see what an image of the two characters clinking glasses adds to the article. Yes, the relationship is significant, but it does not need to be illustrated by a non-free image. J Milburn (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't significantly add to understanding the subject. AniMate^draw 00:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - Image was definitely decorative, and has now been removed from the article/orphaned.— TAnthony^Talk 01:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claudia Zacchara 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claudia Zacchara 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nk3play2 (notify | contribs).

There appears to be an edit war between two different images here, but, either way, it is not needed. Yes, the relationship between the characters is significant, but it does not need to be illustrated by a non-free image. J Milburn (talk) 22:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

::I think you've made an error, this image is used in Claudia Zacchara to illustrate the subject of the article; I'm not sure why the other editor was uploading a two-shot, but can you withdraw this ifd? — TAnthony^Talk 22:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never added this photo. As far as I'm concerned you delete it. Someone probably used my name by accident. — Nk3play2 —Preceding undated comment added 22:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Now orphaned by TAnthony- there was a misunderstanding. Editors to the page accept that the image is no longer needed. J Milburn (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Image was decorative and now orphaned, a single image already exists to identify character.— TAnthony^Talk 23:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.