Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/La Isla Bonita/archive4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 6 December 2024 [1].

La Isla Bonita

[edit]
Nominator(s): Christian (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about one of American singer Madonna's most iconic and known songs, "La Isla Bonita". Having nominated this article previously, and having read the comments left by other users, I went source by source, making sure everything mentioned is properly cited. Christian (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review from Hurricanehink

[edit]

Support. As a musician familiar with this song, I figured I'd review it, due to having an FAC of my own.

  • She also said: "[Pat and I] both think that we were Latin in another life [...] [because] Latin rhythms often dominate our uptempo compositions". - seeing as previously Pat was introduced as Patrick Leonard, perhaps the name should be Patrick here for consistency, especially since it's in a bracket.Done
  • "In 2014, while working on her thirteenth studio album Rebel Heart (2015) with producer Diplo, Madonna recorded a dubplate of "La Isla Bonita" with new lyrics that referenced trio Major Lazer.[15] This version premiered in March 2015 on BBC Radio 1Xtra." - I had to look up what a dubplate is... seems like this version is for vinyl release, right? I think a lot more people are aware of vinyl records. Either way, it sounds like it's a new recorded version, correct? If so, are the new lyrics in the form of a new verse, or is it just new vocals? This part comes out of left field and I'm not sure what to make of it. Shouldn't the dubplate version also be included under "Track listing and formats"?
  • Done I aditionally changed the mention to the Composition and Lyrics section
I didn't found any sources mentioning a release that merits being under the forementioned section, just YouTube and SoundCloud links.
Isn't digital release a format? It just seems odd this version of the song isn't included in this section. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not on itunes/spotify/amazon music; like I mentioned, it is only available on YouTube and soundcloud, and there are many links, and none from an official source.
Yea but Youtube and Soundcloud both cound as release format, don't they? Also, it seems like the remix version is available from the Madonna channel, which is considered the official Madonna channel on YouTube, having almost all of her stuff. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The dubplate Diplo Remix is not included on neither Madonna or Diplo's official YouTube Channel.
  • "The song is set in the key of C♯ minor, with Madonna's voice spanning between G3 to C5." - because of the key signature, those notes should be G#3 and C#5. I appreciate you including this information, however.
    Done
  • Not a complaint, but I also really appreciated the balanced reviews of the song, plus its place in Latin music history in the US.
  • "and became the most requested video in the channel's history for a record-breaking 20 consecutive weeks." - was that for TRL? How did people request the video on MTV pre-internet? This was a bit before my time.
    That's how/what the source mentions, that it was the most requested. I tried looking for sources that specify how it was requested (my guess is that people usually phoned the channels) but didn't find any valid sources.
  • "As of 2018, it is one of her most viewed music videos on YouTube." - what about 6 years later? Or I'm guessing you might not have an updated source, no biggie if that's the case.
  • "La Isla Bonita" has been included on eight of Madonna's concert tours: Who's That Girl (1987), the Girlie Show (1993), Drowned World (2001), Confessions (2006), Sticky & Sweet (2008–2009), Rebel Heart (2015–2016), Madame X (2019–2020), and Celebration (2023–2024). On the first one, she wore a Spanish cabaret dress, and was joined by her backup singers Niki Haris, Donna De Lory, and Debra Parson. - just doing a random spotcheck here, but the references here are from 1987 and 1988, so how could those references cite the rest of the tours? Perhaps a source for the songs from Madonna's concert tours? Or otherwise a grouped citation?
    I could cite the tour's program, which mentions the vocalists; it does not, however, specify their participation on the performance.
Hi @Hurricanehink:! Just checking back! I quite personally like how this section looks/is structured; lumping citations for each tour, I believe would causeemore notes than necessary.--Christian (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind how the section is structured, but there isn't a citation that proves "La Isla Bonita" has been included on eight of Madonna's concert tours. It's implied that the song's appearance is in refs 103 and 104, but that's not the case. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All in all a great read, and I'm shocked no one else has commented yet! Let me know if you have any questions about these comments. Cheers - ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your great comments @Hurricanehink:--Christian (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Few replies. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me see if how I've left it works @Hurricanehink:--Christian (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just checking how you're doing about my last few comments? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chrishm21 ? Gog the Mild (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Hurricanehink:! Just got back home from a trip so I hadn't got the chance to log in. I have included the citations that mention the song's inclusion on the mentioned concert tours. Let me know--Christian (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to support now. I just fixed the one comment on my own, the one about linking Patrick Leonard, and changing the quote from [Pat and I] to [Patrick and I]. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator note

[edit]

As per the instructions at the top of WP:FAC, please refrain from using graphics like {{done}} as they slow down the page load time. FrB.TG (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Three weeks in and just the single general support. Unless this nomination makes significant further progress towards a consensus to promote over the next five or six days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]
  • File:Madonna_-_La_Isla_Bonita.ogg needs a more substantial FUR, particularly purpose of use
Hi @Nikkimaria:! Thank you for your comments; both files are meant to showcase the mentioning of the San Pedro line, and Madonna's Flamenco dancer character from the video--Christian (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In both cases the rationale should be elaborated in the FUR template on the image description page. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Nikkimaria:! Let me know if how I've mentioned on the image talk page is correct.--Christian (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't quite follow the change you've made on the second - is it replaceable, or is it necessary to illustrate what you've said it's illustrating? And I'm not seeing any changes on the first? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is is replaceable, but I mentioned why this particular screenshot was used. If it were to be replaced, it should first be discussed on the article's talk page. Same for the audio file; I explained the purpose on the section it's used. Let me if it works @Nikkimaria:! Christian (talk) 01:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Apoxyomenus

[edit]
  • Hi, article overall looks good at first glance. Here are some points from a quick view,
The Massachusetts Daily Collegian | It is a student-newspaper, and not sure if is enough reliable to use it.
Charts: West Germany (GfK) (weekly) vs West Germany (Official German Charts), you should use one only. Or GFK or Official German Charts to keep consistensy. The same goes to Iceland (RÚV) while in ref's parameter RÚV is italicized. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All fixed. Let me know @Apoxyomenus Christian (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good! Article looks fine to me. Support nomination. Cheers --Apoxyomenus (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review & spot-check

[edit]

Some sources throw a "CS1 maint: others in cite AV media (notes)" error. There are a number of sources saying Billboard or Music & Media but linking https://www.worldradiohistory.com/ and should explain this, and Billboard needs no ISSN. What make https://chrisbungostudios.com/, http://www.chartsinfrance.net/Alizee/news-66412.html, https://www.logotv.com/news/bdtywh/madonnas-55-best-videos-in-honor-of-her-55th-birthday and https://infodisc.fr/Chanson_Certifications.php reliable sources? Does Los 40 need italics or other formatting? Wondering if "Chow, Victoria (2004). Madonna. Metro Media Publishers. ISBN 1-904756-12-3." is a reliable source, and AllMusic. "Consumption and Spirituality" is unused. Google Books needs no archive links. Does "Madonna: The Rolling Stone Files" not have an author? Spot-check of this version:

  • 1 Need a quote for 1985.I also think not all of the content is on these two pages.
Page 40 of Madonna: A Biography by Madonna [Mentions the Virgin tour and the year 1985, and flows into '...Madonna was already into her next project that fall, writing and recording for her third studio album, True Blue'
I think the only part missing is "with whom she had worked on her previous album Like a Virgin (1984)" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The forementioned Mary Cross source also mentions Bray: She brought back Stephen Bray and hired a new songwriter... I have added two new sources that mentions Bray's input on both Like a Virgin and True Blue.
  • 2 Does not say that the victory tour was in 1984
Per Victory Tour article.
I think it's better to omit the year, then. We can't rely on other Wikipedia articles as sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a source too back up the year of the tour @Jo-Jo Eumerus:.
  • 42 Does not mention Ed Schrodt.
Ed Schrodt reviews 'La Isla Bonita' on Slant Magazine's ranking, ref. 43
Where does it say "Ed"? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's Paul Schrodt, my bad. Again, in the article; the first songs have the name and lastname of the author who's reviewing them (Sal Cinquemani, Eric Henderson, Paul Schrodt and so on) In the case of 'La Isla Bonita' (no. 15 on the ranking), it clearly lists Schrodt as the last name of the reviewer Schrodt = Paul Schrodt
  • 56 Where is "On March 21, 1987" and "and one of the most added songs on radio stations"
Lean on Me' hits no. 1 for the 2nd time, by Paul Grein; ['Madonna's 'La Isla Bonita' is the new top entry on this week's Hot 100], dated March 21, 1987
Does that date really reference the debut, rather than the publication of the article? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an additional source
Still not getting it. Perhaps a quote would help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but what is it you don't get? It's clearly in ref 56 (The week of March 21, 1987) in the original unarchived link, number 49, it says the word 'New' next to the song's title. La Isla Bonita entered the chart, was a new addition to the chart... in the week of March 21, 1987 Same for ref 57 ('Lean on Me'); 'La Isla Bonita' is the top new entry on this week's Hot 100 at No. 49; the issue belongs to the week of March 21, 1987, therefore indicating the song entered the Hot 100 chart in the week of March 21, 1987. I did deleted the 'most added to radio stations' part, as nowhere in the sources does it mention that.
The radio thing was the problem. If it's gone, this one's resolved. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 66 This should be flagged so that it shows the archived link. It's not on place 58?
Sources taken from chart template.
  • 76 OK
  • 77 OK
  • 82 OK
  • 85 Need a quote or something.
  • 108 Need a quote or something.
Cite AV Media
  • 109 Need a quote or something.
Cite AV Media
'fraid that the photo is too small to make out the date. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of which one? @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Are the others OK?--Christian (talk) 14:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Italy one. Also, if the whirlpool image is the Japan one, it doesn't mention either the date or the place. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added web sources for all releases @Jo-Jo Eumerus: --Christian (talk) 15:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It supports the Hasselhoff cover; the screenshot to the book is included on the google drive I shared with you @Jo-Jo Eumerus: --Christian (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 158 Even accessing both sources, I don't get everything.
The AllMusic link -which by the way is a perfectly valid source used on multiple music-related articles- is that of the Mexican tour edition of Alizee's album; in the tracklisting section, it clearly mentions 'La Isla Bonita'
I remember that for a while, AllMusic was considered to be WP:USERGENERATED which is why I always wonder. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AllMusic is used in multiple music-related FAs. See 4, Fearless, 1989, Holy Wood, and many more
  • 162 This says nothing about leaks or anything untoward.
Native Spanish speaker here; ['la web de fans de la cantante, Breatheheavy, acaba de sacar a la luz = The singer's fansite, Breateheavey, leaked online']
  • 175 What does this support?
My bad, it supports the Super Mix Green RSD Exclusive 2019 release
  • 178 Where is "Flanders"?
Flanders, the dutch-speaking northern portion of Belgium; per chart-template configuration it shows up like that
I worry that this is a bit WP:SYNTH Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's how the chart template is programmed, so I don't see an isse. (See the forementioned featured articles)
What chart template? If it's on Wikipedia, it might need fixing. Same for the one below. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm using the Template:Single chart#Non-Billboard charts

* 186 Need someone who can read Japanese to verify.

  • 196 OK
  • 205 Pretty sure this source doesn't say "30000 exactly".
It doesn't mention the number, but it does mention the single was certified gold; 30000 was the amount of copies a single needes to sell/ship to be certified gold here in Spain
OK, but in that case it should say "at least 30000" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, per chart-template configuration it cannot be written/pointed out like that.
I don't think the chart-template configuration justifies writing it out like that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See forementioned featured articles I've linked before. If you believe it should be specified differently, a discussion should be created in the template page.
See Template:Certification Table Entry

Bit many source/text disagreements if this article needs to be watched for fabricated content (per FrB.TG's note at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Image and source check requests). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left some comments. I must digress a little and ask if it's really necessary to add quotes for the Harvard citations. I've looked into other featured articles and never once did I encounter this. I look forward to your answer @Jo-Jo Eumerus:--Christian (talk) 15:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant quotes or screenshots or photos here (not in the article) so that I can verify the content. For spotchecks I generally want to see everything for myself. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You want screenshots/photos... of the sources? @Jo-Jo Eumerus:--Christian (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The relevant pages, at least. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have posted a link to the Mary Cross (in fact, the most relevant book sources are linked on the 'Literary sources' section) , and found a new one for the Spain chart position -I was not able to access the Salaverri book. For the Cite AV media ones, shall I post the link to the releases sleeves? Let me know if it works. @Jo-Jo Eumerus:--Christian (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The usual ways is by either uploading a screenshot or photo to Google Drive and posting a link here, or by emailing them to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will get back to you with the other sources in a bit @Jo-Jo Eumerus:--Christian (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Keep in mind that I'll be busy updating my own articles in these weeks, so I might not respond immediately. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New comments @Jo-Jo Eumerus:--Christian (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sent you an email @Jo-Jo Eumerus:.--Christian (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, but I must note that Google Books links are personalized and don't work for everybody. The one you sent to me doesn't work for me, for example. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-email! @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Christian (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it requires a password. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if it works now @Jo-Jo Eumerus: --Christian (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:! How are you? can you please let me know which sources need to be verified? I'll be out of home this weekend, but will get back on Monday --Christian (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, had computer problems and was working on other Wikipedia articles, so I now lost track a bit. I think I've handled the things you sent me in that Drive? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:! Sorry for the long reply; let me know if all your comments have been addressed. Christian (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replied by points. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:! See my comments :) --Christian (talk) 16:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out a point, but there are several sources that still need checking 85, 108 and 186. Regarding 205 and 178, I am not sure if to ask for a fix here or on the talk pages; I don't work on these templates. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:! I have removed the Who's That Girl: Live in Japan mention (and source; 106), as well as the Salaverri one (85), leaving only the one that mentions the song reaching top-eight in Spain Christian (talk) 16:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That leaves only 186; perhaps WP:TRANSLATE has some help? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:! I have fixed the Japanese source (186); I was easily able to access it using Google translate. Let me know--Christian (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me it says 38? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes @Jo-Jo Eumerus:, the article has been updated with that information (the song reached 38 in Japan on 1987, not 95) --Christian (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but I think this is my last comment on the archived FAC. Let's continue this discussion on the article talk page, if anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heartfox

[edit]

Apologies for the late comments, but I am confused by the structure of the critical reception section.

  • "Upon release, "La Isla Bonita" was met with generally positive reviews from music critics and authors" opens the first paragraph, but then the majority of the paragraph actually includes retrospective reviews.
  • Likewise, there is a retrospective paragraph with general commentary (not just a list of rankings), but retrospective reviews are already used throughout the section so this feels a bit selective.
  • I'm also struggling with the second paragraph. There are different sentences about Latin influences, production, and Madonna's vocals, but there is not a theme about this given to readers. It seems like it is supposed to include more specific praise other than the generally positive comments in the previous paragraph, but it still feels wanting? A more effective structure might be a paragraph for each of these aspects, and then go into positive/negative comments there, rather than grouping everything into positive/mixed paragraphs.
  • A review is attributed to the Kentucky New Era, but a search on Newspapers.com shows it was actually written by David Bauder of the Associated Press. Likewise, a review is attributed to Ryan Murphy of The Spokesman-Review, but this was actually written by Ryan Murphy of the Miami Herald and then syndicated to The Spokesman-Review. This type of thing leads me to believe there is not much research that has gone on in WP:TWL databases. Not saying you're going to get paragraphs worth of new information, but it doesn't feel like this article meets 1c "it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature". To only have 3 contemporaneous reviews of the song doesn't feel right; there is more available with a little more research.
  • Likewise, a 2016 book chapter by Cambridge University Press (https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316663837.016) includes many pages about the music video, yet this seemingly very useful source is not cited in the article. This is on the first page of Google Scholar, so I'm not sure why it is overlooked.

I will have to oppose at this time per 1a, 1c. Heartfox (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chrishm21 ? Gog the Mild (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. My trip took a little longer than expected. I'm dealing with some work issues but was able to log in and do some editing. I have corrected the introduction paragraph in the Critical Reception section, in a way that so as to encompass initial and retrospective reviews. Regarding the praise for the song's Latin , the mentioned sources only make emphasis on the "exotic" influence. I think it would be redundant. I have added specified the reviews towards the production and Madonna's vocals. Let me know if it's OK

I have no access to newspapers.com or the Cambridge university website -Not that it's relevant to the subject, but I didn't attend college and therefore can't access through an university- Also, just like newspapers.com, I crated an account but I see it has a cost; right now my wallet doesn't allow me to invest on something like this. Besides, the sources are all properly quoted from the google books sources, so I really don't see the issue. If there's a way to view the ones you mentioned without having to pay, let me know.

Looking forward to your comments! @Heartfox:--Christian (talk) 18:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I linked WP:TWL above; a lot of research can be done for free using these databases. Other paywalled sources can also be requested at WP:RX. But this is something that should be done outside of the FAC process. Heartfox (talk) 22:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Heartfox:! Question: Is it necessary to use The Wikipedia Library for an article to be FA approved? I looked into it and some of the book sources (and web sources) are already present on the article.--Christian (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, but when you're dealing with a song from 1986 there is going to be more content that is not freely available online. Heartfox (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Heartfox:! If I may, there are many featured articles of songs from the 80s (and before) that don't use half the amount of sources I'm using here (ie. "Angel of Death (Slayer song)", "Nothing to My Name", "Touch Me I'm Sick", "Watching the River Flow", among others) I believe the sources I've included here cover all aspects of "La Isla Bonita" in a way that's more than enough. As time and Madonna's career go on, there'll be many more books and articles written that'll mention new information that's not here, and when they do, I'll nbe the first one to add them. I'll continue looking for more information in sources, both on the Wikipedia Library and outside of it. But as of now, I believe, source-wise, this article meets all the necessary criteria for a FA status. Christian (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before, there are only three contemporaneous reviews of the song cited in the article even though there are many more available on TWL databases. Citing three does not reflect "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature" of the contemporaneous reviews. Reviews continue to be attributed incorrectly (Kentucky New Era, Spokesman-Review) because the original articles available on Newspapers.com by different publications are not cited. Cambridge University Press chapter is available on TWL but there is still no argument for why it is omitted. Heartfox (talk) 20:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Heartfox:! Like I previously mentioned, I have no access to Newspaper.com or The Campbridge University Press chapter; I'm not gonna spend 125Eur ($47USD for Cambridge and $79USD for Newspapers) I have no way to be certain regarding the Newspaper.com source--Christian (talk) 15:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chris. Time saver: Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library → What we do → Database access. You have a plenty of databases later through The Wikipedia Library for free: Newspaperarchive articles, ProQuest or Ebscohost once you have the accesibility by that way. Also, some of the books requested above, you can do a search through Archive.org, for example, if the book is available. Or find another alternative source. Time saver, in minutes/hours or a single-day you can solve requests as such. My best regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This has been here for a while and seems some way from a consensus to promote, so I am going to archive it. I suggest working on the areas flagged up off-FAC, possibly with the reviewer who raised them. The usual two-week hiatus will apply. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/La_Isla_Bonita/archive4&oldid=1262237298"