Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wholesale City
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. consensus at this point is unmistakable. but If good sources can be found, then recreation might be possible DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wholesale City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources currently in this article are utterly inadequate, either irrelevant or unreliable.
- "Affordable shopping" is about Kenanga Wholesale City, whose homepage is http://www.kenangacity.com.my/, not http://www.wholesale-dress.net/. Also, according to the page, Kenanga Wholesale City is "a development by KWC Sdn Bhd, a company within Kha Seng Group of Companies", completely unrelated to the subject of this article.
- "A whirl of attractions at KWC" also is about Kenanga Wholesale City.
- "Wholesale-dress.net: New Business Model of Fast Fashion" is a press release from PR Newswire.
- "Wholesale-dress.net Benefits From Fast-growing Social Networking" is a press release from PR Newswire.
- "Wholesale-dress.net Offering More Than Cheap Products" is a press release from PR Newswire.
I ran a Google search for "Wholesale City" "Hangzhou" and "Hangzhou Wholesale E-commerce", both of which retrieved zero results.
There are zero reliable sources that provide any coverage, let alone significant coverage, of this company.
Goodvac (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Did you check to see if there were any sources in Chinese? Sven Manguard Wha? 18:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually didn't, so thanks for pointing that out. Unfortunately, looking at http://www.wholesale-dress.net/, I don't see a Chinese name that could be a plausible search term. I tried Google's "Translated foreign pages" feature, but searches for "Wholesale City" and "Hangzhou Wholesale E-commerce" retrieve nothing promising. Goodvac (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Self-promotional advertisement. I also could find no independent sources about the company. As the nominator stated, three of the sources given are merely reprints of the company's won press releases, and the other two are about a totally different company altogether. If the company is actually what the press releases say it is, there should be adequate information available in English. That there is none strongly suggests that the press releases are greatly exaggerated. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The sources I added when declining the prod (the first two in the above nomination) were about a different company, and I've removed them from the article. I apologize for the error. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.