Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vorbarra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vorbarra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod, so now we get to waste our time here. I don't think there is anything here to even warrant merging, this is pure unreferenced fancruft that fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Much as I like the Vorkosigan books, I don't think they have hit the critical mass of actually being studied and reviewed by people to have the intricacies of the setting be encyclopedic. That this article is referenced to primary sources, meaning this article is a secondary source (at best), is just the cherry on top. Rockphed (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vorkosigan Saga as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.