Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Browne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Browne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently fails WP:GNG. Individual apparently successful but no evidence of notability. One source with no footnotes. Doddy Wuid (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. There are some references to Browne in books, but I didn't find sufficient coverage. tedder (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entire article is unverified. Even if everything in the article is true, it doesn't seem to add up to notability. Google News finds little (hard to search because his name is so common). --MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.