Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House (Porches album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) versacespace leave a message! 21:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The House (Porches album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn, I apologize for the lack of BEFORE on my part. HouseOfChange (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC) ~~No claim of notability. Non-notable album by non-notable group~~ HouseOfChange (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 23:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: umm... what? This has been reviewed in EIGHTEEN reliable sources. Richard3120 (talk) 23:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - clearly notable, 18 critic reviews available, out of which 9 are already present in the article. --Ashley yoursmile! 06:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly meets WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG with coverage from The Guardian, NME, Pitchfork... Bizarre deletion nomination... Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep As per all above, it meets WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG with coverage from The Guardian, NME, Pitchfork and many more. A quick google search shows many results. Hypogaearoots (talk) 08:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nom has some explaining to do on this one. Why start an AfD for this album after PRODing Porches (band) minutes earlier? Deletion of the album requires discussion but deletion of the band does not? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slapping myself with a trout here for a nomination done without adequate BEFORE. I somehow landed on article for a non-notable album, noticed the band had articles for multiple albums, assumed without really checking that there was PROMO for non-notable band. So I started AfDing albums until I found an album that clearly had real coverage, at which point I stopped AfDing. I also decided not to dispute the removal of the Notability tag I had put on the band's article, since I saw my mistake. Sorry for not doing more to clean up the mess. HouseOfChange (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.