Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalker (Philip Reeve)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stalker (Philip Reeve)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plot element from a series of novels, not independently notable (WP:GNG) for lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the author of the fictional work described. Not appropriate for a merger, as it consists only of excessive plot summary (WP:WAF). Sandstein 19:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the article is now, it contains no secondary sources and is written in an in-universe style. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not notable outside of the series, it's unsourced, and it's all in an in-universe style. Three strikes and you're out.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete - The topic is not notable - the only sources are from the books themselves. Completely in-universe and with no evidence of real-world notability. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.