Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sefer Sheva Mitzvot HaShem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sefer Sheva Mitzvot HaShem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, and no importance of importance TalkToMe_c^intelati 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for a lack of references that establish notability. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect this nice tidbit to the main Seven Laws of Noah article. The title of this article, Sefer Sheva Mitzvot HaShem is a Hebrew transliteration, translated into English as the "Book [of the] Seven Commandments [of] God" which is what the Seven Laws of Noah are and also known as. IZAK (talk) 05:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and per IZAK. I'm not sure it needs a redirect. Joe407 (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The book exists [1] is there any reason to deny an article based on that? --Shuki (talk) 01:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The mere existence of a book does not warrant an article about the subject of that book. Does the book meet the criteria for being notable? Wikipedia is not a catalog of fringe religious books. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 10:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence this passes WP:NBOOK Hekerui (talk) 10:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no sources - no article. Do not merge unsourced content. Sandstein 07:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not merge per Wikipedia:Verifiability. I concur with Sandstein. Cunard (talk) 09:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.