Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOHO 2333
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 96P/Machholz#2007 perihelion. Is there a soft merge? More relists than input, but I don't see a third one changing that and there's no opposition to the merge recommendation. Star Mississippi 02:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SOHO 2333 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability guideline of WP:NASTRO; no scientific notability and has been only covered once by news sources. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 03:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Merge: I did find a few news stories about this comet, so it may have a certain minor notability in the WP:GNG sense. It appears to be a fragment of 96P/Machholz that broke off during the 2007 perihelion, so perhaps a merge into '96P/Machholz#2007 perihelion' would work?[1] Praemonitus (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.