Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SC Staaken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close, malformed and proceduraly unnecessary AfD. The move to draft has been reverted, any further objections to this article being in mainspace should be taken up in a new AfD opened by an editor actually arguing for them. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Hello,[reply]

I wrote the article for SC Staaken. User:Onel5969 had notability issues with it and marked it as a draft. User:Onel5969 has had other issues with articles I have written including Harburger TB and Hamburg-Eimsbütteler Ballspiel-Club.

I am just marking it for deletion myself so we can make sure the deletion process isn't being deleted through - Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Incubation. I think it is just best to take it here so we Wikipedia:AGF.

I also want to add that situations like this are why I do not contribute to wikipedia as much as I could.

Sorry if I made any mistakes. I have never done this before.

KatoKungLee (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.