Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qiao Liang (Three Kingdoms)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 05:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qiao Liang (Three Kingdoms)

I am nominating this article and a bunch of others created by the same user below because I have reason to believe that these are hoaxes. These articles are all unsourced, and anyone with some knowledge of the Three Kingdoms period would not recognize any of the the people and the stories listed in these articles. I have opted to mass nominated these articles since the stories are interrelated, revolving around a fake warlord, with the creator attempting to insert his fantasy into legitimate biographies to make his stories believable.

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the reasons stated above:

_dk (talk) 02:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question How can you demonstrate to us that these are indeed hoaxes? Agreed they are unsourced, but as this is not a subject I will be effective in searching myself, I cannot really check if they are unsourceable. DGG (talk) 03:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For one, most of the names do not appear in Rafe de Crespigny's A biographical dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms. For the ones that do, the biographies in the dictionary are completely different from those in these articles. _dk (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I wasn't able to verify the existence of these with a standard google search (though Qiao Liang does appear to be an Olympic gymnast). Unless the creator or someone else is able to verify the accuracy of the information, the encyclopedia won't be able to use it. Of course, if sources do become available, then I'll change my nonvote. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all and give final warning to Themightylubu246 (talk · contribs), who created these articles. I think it's pretty clear to me that these are hoaxes that border on vandalism as the user created links from real personalities' articles to these articles. --Nlu (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See also Lubu713 (talk · contribs). --Nlu (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See also 66.68.247.104 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). --Nlu (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Walled garden of hoaxes. I struggled through the first wall of text, but the content is rambling and unverifiable. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we can't take chances on hoaxes. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per everyone - hoax. Edward321 (talk) 04:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this article should be deleted. --!Lee! (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.