Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Jean (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theo polisme 00:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peggy Jean

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. Probably because she was a minor character that didn't really appear that often. There's some sources that mention that she exists, but no significant coverage to WP:verify notability. As the notability guideline states, need more than a WP:TRIVIALMENTION of one or two tiny facts to establish notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC) (categories)[reply]

Keep - As far as I can tell, this is a notable subject. I found 63 news articles in NewsBank and at least one with non-trivial coverage. - Mr X 22:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The sources are two, which is a squeaker, but they are full-length about Peggy Jean, so it adds to the weight. If anyone can find more it would go a long way to saving the article. Just saying sources exist, or posting here but not adding them to the article, won't save it from AfD #3, #4, etc.. until some day it finally does get deleted. One has to actually add the sources to the article to ensure it won't get deleted (now or in the future). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Probably keep An avid reader of the funnies, I only remember seeing her once or twice, that's not to say she hasn't appeared more often. I am !voting keep on account of what MrX found, but I would agree with Green Cardamom that just saying that sources exist isn't really that helpful. Go Phightins! 22:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.