Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Sentinel
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unsourced content should not be merged (WP:V). Also deleted the copyvio derivative work File:Omegasentinel eng.jpg. Sandstein 07:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Omega Sentinel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is loaded with original research, it lacks reliable third person information to assert its notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or Merge to List of Transformers: Energon characters. Also, I'm not seeing any original research here. --Divebomb (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No major coverage in the Wall Street Journal, etc. Tedescoboy22 (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete even less notable than most (and that's saying something) this one didn't appear on the show at all. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Omega_Supreme#Transformers:_Energon, this character is just a variant of a character who does have an article with third party references, and should go there. Mathewignash (talk) 07:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a poor article with no reliable sources.80.40.144.68 (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Allen for IPv6 18:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.