Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceans (EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oceans (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. The album that the single was drawn from is notable. The song on the EP is notable. The EP itself is not notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The EP consists of only one song, but in four/five track versions. It appeared on Billboard Christian Songs chart at No. 1. If necessary the article could be moved/renamed for the song as there is no separate article. However, it should not be deleted.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:06, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The song appeared, not the EP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - The EP has been described in 3+ independent sources (see below), and should be kept as a stand-alone article. A separate article for the single would also be notable.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep I have no idea why this was PRODed. A Google search of "'oceans' ep hillsong" brought up five results on the first two pages: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and a g-search of Christianity Today brought up this. There's probably more out there, but these sources alone are enough for a keep. I'd also say create an article for the song, it is definitely notable (notable enough that this EP was created because of it).--¿3family6 _contribs 14:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the EP has sufficient independent verifiable sources to establish notability.Dan arndt (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.