Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Idea (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Idea (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still no notability established after WP:PROD removed, and doesn't pass WP:NM. There is a lack of sources available for this group, the only sources seem to be self-published sources (such as blogspot) Ajf773 (talk) 05:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails SIGCOV. Suspected self-promotion or at least COI. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)}
Delete I'm frankly surprised that nonsense like this has to be put through an AFD process. It should have been deleted at the PROD stage. Notability non existent from what I can see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.23.148 (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- This was through the WP:PROD process and it was declined by one single editor (I don't know what they were thinking!)(Ajf773 (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]
Delete. Doesn't come close to meeting the notability guidelines for musicians. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and PROD was an acceptable form of deletion, examining this still found nothing for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.