Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Pal Foot Foot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Philosophy of the World. Consensus against keeping, no arguments against its use as a valid redirect query. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 12:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My Pal Foot Foot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough mainstream coverage, does not meet notability standards. StewdioMACK (talk) 14:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Seeing this here brings back memories of the "Philosophy of the World" LP, which has I think sufficient ongoing discussion in its own right, but not this particular song on the album. AllyD (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Philosophy of the World - This one pains me. I'm finding a little bit of coverage that pays special attention to the song (rather than mentioning it in association with the band/album), e.g. CBSLocal (WXRT) and briefly discussed on NPR's Morning Edition (HighBeam link), but I've looked here, I've looked there, I've looked everywhere, oh foot foot why can't I find more sources about you. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable or worthy for inclusion in an encyclopedia--Star Log, Lfrankblam, Kirk Out (talk) 22:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Philosophy of the World. Giant Snowman 19:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.