Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mou Rong (Tang dynasty)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mou Rong (Tang dynasty) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article may not meet the WP:GNG guidelines required for inclusion. Note that this is about the person from the Tang dynasty, not about Mou Rong from the Han dynasty, who is verifiable, if not notable. Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If he were indeed included in the Three Hundred Tang Poems, that would make him ipso facto highly notable. As for unsourced, see my previous comment. 188.216.192.206 (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But are his poems in fact included in the Three Hundred Tang Poems? His name doesn't appear in the list of poets in that article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I wrote "If he were ...".188.216.192.3 (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.