Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Rummukainen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 12:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Rummukainen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 17:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has played 292 games in the AIHL the top level national competition in Australia and has been a member of Australia's national team competing at a number of World Championships. Dan arndt (talk) 05:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: Lots of WP:ROUTINE mentions and some decent articles/interviews in the local Canberra paper. Unfortunately, none of those seem to be "significant coverage" by a non-local paper. I could go either way with this one, but I am not thoroughly convinced it meets GNG (as in it would be very borderline). Definitely does not meet NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times are not 'local' newspapers, neither is the ABC. Dan arndt (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that the Canberra Times is also the local paper for the CBR Braves, which also happens to have the best article about this player. Hard to tell if the article itself is more of a "and in local news, the captain of CBR Braves..." type article or actually independent coverage (which either way I might count as one good reference, hence my weak delete verdict instead of just delete). The Sydney Morning Herald and ABC articles are both about the team itself with passing mentions or brief interviews with the player. Yosemiter (talk) 04:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –XboxGamer22408^talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete his hockey related material is a joke, he's never played at any level worthy of consideration. His GNG argument is a tiny bit stronger, but there's not enough there for an article. Deadman137 (talk) 04:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails WP:NHOCKEY. DrStrauss talk 06:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.