Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Like Me (musical)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Like Me (musical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to have had a full production. Does not appear to have independent reliable coverage. Boneymau (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
No claim is made on the page that it has had a 'full production'. It has however had a number of limited run showcase productions in New York and London which are fully independently referenced/verified both by WhatsonStage and BroadwayWorld. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanseng (talk • contribs) 17:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The BroadwayWorld article appears to be a media release. The WhatsonStage reference is not really an independent source. Just because the work exists does not make it notable for WP. It's just WP:TOOSOON.Boneymau (talk) 02:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 01:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 01:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Is relatively well sourced for a small show, and has had a lot of notable people involved.Mark E (talk) 08:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.