Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Barnes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Barnes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a mess. This article is all in universe information and no real world information. There only two sources for this article, one probably a dead link, and another and interview. This overall doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:FILM. I would highly request a speedy delete. Toby2023 (talk) 17:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't see enough sources for WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.