Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG-Nortel IP Phone 8540

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to LG-Ericsson. Edit history preserved for future editorial merging. causa sui (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LG-Nortel IP Phone 8540

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge verifiable data to Unified communications, a better solution compared to blanket deletion. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That does not seem like a good place to merge info about one particular model of phone. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge' , but Alan is quite right that it serves no purpose to merge to such general articles. Rather, we shouldmake an article on this brand of phones, and merge it in there. It has sometimes been objected in such circumstances that there might be no such page at present, but that can be dealt with by editing: Move this article to such a page, give it a section heading, and and a one-sentence general introductory statement--then there will be a place to merge the other. the principle is to allow for expansion, as NOT PAPER. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to LG-Ericsson. The individual product is not notable enough for an article, but it is already has several sentences at this article about the company that makes it. --MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.