Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jian-Hua Zhuang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jian-Hua Zhuang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello all. I found this page while I was clearing the backlog at Category:Articles needing Chinese script or text a few weeks ago. I thought I understood the criteria for speedy deletion, but apparently I didn't; so I do apologize for that, and I believe I've given adequate time for the article to improve since that misunderstanding.

Unfortunately, the article remains non-notable. There is only one source, a source from the subject himself. The prizes he has won are not actually named, and information about the competitions is scarce.

I believe that there are not adequate reliable sources about this composer, and that he is not notable as his prizes were not notable, and am thus nominating his article for deletion. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Cannot find anything on him apart from the same brief biographical info, seemingly copied from WP or the one source. His name in Chinese might help, but he is based in Netherlands so any coverage would be expected to use his name as in the article. No evidence of notability.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
seems he is 庄建华 from the WorldCat page, which lists three short compositions. Searching with the Chinese name does not turn up anything beyond that. Also be careful when searching as the top results in Chinese seem to be an entirely different person (a younger woman).--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.