Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Jennings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jess Jennings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. This article was created as a first major edit of a new account on 8 June, and maybe no coincidence that this is created less than 3 months till the Australian federal election, 2013 . he is a candidate and that does not mean automatically notable, I've found a few mentions of comments made by him as a candidate, but that in itself does not establish notability. LibStar (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This person is marginally notable at best. Based on past outcomes, we've deleted the articles of most, but not all, unsuccessful candidates for office. Bearian (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see this passing WP:BIO or WP:POLITICIAN as it currently stands, and frankly I don't like his chances of winning a safe Nationals seat either. --Roisterer (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even close to passing WP:POLITICIAN; I can't see much suggesting it passes WP:BIO either. The seat is one that Labor could potentially win in a really good year, but this isn't going to be one of those. Frickeg (talk) 01:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.