Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Ground (Taylor Swift song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album) . While there was no argument for notability at all, there was also only one argument advanced in favor of, and none against, a redirect, and WP:ATD gives us a reason to prefer the redirect j⚛e decker ^talk 20:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Ground (Taylor Swift song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS not only for lacking significant coverage from reliable third-party sources that aren't album reviews, but also for not having enough solo information to grow beyond a stub. WP:CFORK at best. Snuggums (talk / edits) 08:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG completely. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:54, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album) per IndianBio and SNUGGUMS. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another song which has received no more than routine mentions in reviews of the album it belongs to. The album is obviously available to download track-by-track. But that doesn't mean that all the songs have the status of singles, as evidenced by lack of in-depth coverage. Weak content forks only water down Wikipedia. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.