Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Stark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Ultimate Marvel characters. (Non-admin closure) Till 01:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Stark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor character, just a couple of story arcs. No out-of-universe information (perhaps there's none noteworthy beyond the trivial "it's a character from this and this storyline"). Cambalachero (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Ultimate Marvel characters per WP:ATD. Yes, I realize that list currently has no detailed character info, but it would be most in line with our previous WP:OUTCOMES to make one big list article out of a bunch of not-individually-notable articles. Jclemens (talk) 04:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:39, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge for the sake of building a consensus. Would support deletion in this instance since there isn't much reliable and useful information here, let alone anything that would WP:Verify notability. Merge with the possibility someone can do something with it. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.