Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Hampton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Hampton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress probably doesn't meet the notability requirements for actors. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and United Kingdom. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and United Kingdom. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article has enough acceptable sources to pass and subject does meet NACTOR. Nate • (chatter) 02:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How so? A lot of the roles are minor. Plus the articles are not substantive.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20120321162014/http://www.holby.tv/news/present-news/item/420-fiona-hampton-joins-holby
Looks like a blog.
- https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/jul/19/a-midsummers-night-dream-review-trevor-nunn-ipswich
Is a review on the play itself.
- https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00w0bgl#synopsis
Is just the show listing. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment NACTORS doesn't apply to a subject's overall career. Whether they're 'minor' or major, they pass. Nate • (chatter) 20:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NACTOR says "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or

Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. (Previously #3)"

None of her roles are particularly significant or I doubt she had made several unique, prolific, or innovative contributions to the entertainment fields. So she fails both points of WP:NACTOR. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG. Google reveals no WP:SIGCOV that establishes notability. IrishOsita (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:NACTOR* IrishOsita (talk) 23:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.