Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminine Is Beautiful
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Manic Street Preachers discography. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Feminine Is Beautiful (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable enough to warrant its own Wikipedia article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 08:16, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (express) @ 21:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Only passing mentions. Shii (tock) 15:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- While I don't see notability sufficient to keep, I don't see why a redirect to Manic Street Preachers discography would not be preferable. --j⚛e deckertalk 00:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 04:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 04:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to msnic street preachers discography. Insufficient references from reliable sources to support independent notability. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.