Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EA Home Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EA Home Design

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks independent coverage. Sources are advertorial/PR pieces. KH-1 (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, was in the process of cleaning out all the junk sources. A quick external search reveals nothing but the same paid placement/PR/SEO sinks. Does not appear to be anything notable about this firm. Kuru (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough significant news. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Jaxarnolds (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotion. Looks like the subject hired a PR agent who got a few paid posts via Forbes and Entrepreneur contrinutors (not editorial) and got published in the IBTimes by their Singapore desk. Why would a publication from Singapore be interested in a remodeling company from Virginia? Or why is the jpost.com writing about them? Because what the jpost calls "Special Content" is paid advertising, and they're not especially conscientious at separating advertising and editorial content. PR people expect that if they can place content like that often enough, it will eventually get picked up by local publications. Don't let them fool you.
Delete per above. Undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for this article. MER-C 17:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indication of notability.--Mvqr (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and CSD G11. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 13:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no assertion of notability here.Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.