Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dongbo 39-class barge
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dongbo 39-class barge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cursory English Google search turns up no supporting sources. Single provided source is a page of a forum thread that is an enthusiast (?) listing of PLAN ship classes (not WP:RS.) - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and China. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. The article itself states that there is little known about the barge. Concur with the weak sourcing, although I wonder how much sourcing can be available about the PLAN. Jinian (talk) 13:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unless better sources in Chinese are found. Mccapra (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Mccapra. Currently all we have is a ref to WP:BAIDU, that's not enough. WP:GNG is not met. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.