Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Prince

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Non-admin closure. AfD is the wrong forum for merger proposals. To request a merger, see Help:Merging#Proposing a merger.--xanchester (t) 09:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Prince

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article needed to be merged with Wonder Woman article as even real people do not receive separate articles for aliases. Needed and important overview of the article has been included in the main Wonder Woman page with updates. WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without commenting on the specifics in this case, it's in principle a perfectly legitimate thing to have separate articles about aliases in comics: there are Clark Kent and Superman articles, for example. Anyway, if you want to merge it, just do it. At no point does Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages suggest taking things to AFD. Morwen - Talk 19:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDY KEEP and then propose a merger. I think this is a good article or bad, but the proposal would seem to be a merger, not a deletion. Right tool for the right job.Mathewignash (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Speedy keep certainly seems to apply here since the proposer is suggesting a merge not a delete. --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.