Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.R.U.G.S Beats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Despite the low level of participation, I just about see consensus, as the one "weak keep" comment has to be taken as very weak, since the linked sources are minimal, and it is an exaggeration to say that "he" was nominated for a Grammy: a record on which he had worked was nominated, and a mere nomination not of oneself but of something one is connected to is really not evidence of notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D.R.U.G.S Beats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO nor WP:REFERENCE. DBrown SPS (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 00:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Per [1] and [2]. He was also nominated for a Grammy. SL93 (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. 66.189.232.210 (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — foxj 20:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.