Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie II
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nom - fails WP:SOFTWARE, no sources, no independent reviews, no awards, zip. Rklawton 16:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 04:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge. No notability asserted, so deletion is reasonable. However, I'd support merging into Wiering Software if that page were found to be viable. DMacks 06:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the same reasons I listed for Wiering Software, nn shareware game. Dave6 07:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:SOFTWARE. MER-C 11:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep there's a Game Tunnel review from the site's creator Russell Carroll here, I personally count Game Tunnel as a reliable source, but that's only one. There's another review here from 24/7 games, with a named reviewer and a score - not the strongest source but a damn sight better than the usual blog mentions and guff from download sites. Other google results are less than promising, but with sifting could yield some more info in the future. I believe there's a nice little neutral and cited article screaming to get out of this somewhat promotional stub. QuagmireDog 04:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, could the original Charlie the Duck not also be merged in? They're virtually the same game by the look of things, just that the sequel has a new set of levels. An article called "Charlie the Duck" featuring both games makes more sense than an article called "Charlie II" and no mention of the first game. QuagmireDog 08:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.