Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibriti Chatterjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bibriti Chatterjee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There isn't much coverage in unbiased secondary sources. In general, TOI is unreliable when discussing films and the individuals who make them. fails WP:GNG. DreamRimmer (talk) 02:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I am satisfied that this individual meets WP:NACTOR guidelines. There are two roles in wikilinked movies that indeed appear notable, and additionally, I found reviews of a non-wikilinked movie, Ebhabei Golpo Hok in the Telegraph and the Indian Express, suggesting that movie may be notable. Further queries for more movies turn up more likely hits that meet WP:ICTFSOURCES. —siro χ o 06:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.