Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belle Nuru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belle Nuru

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:ENTERTAINER John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 09:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)~~ striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article passes the musician guidelines just by having two albums released by a major label. I'm not entirely sure why you referenced the Entertainer guidelines, which is not really what she's known for.

https://itun.es/us/TMibeb https://itun.es/us/3bFeeb Iknowallsecrets (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Please note that Itunes is not considered an independent, reliable source that helps to establish notability. GAB^gab 01:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I only added the above links to show that the albums were released by a major label. Iknowallsecrets (talk) 02:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as major label passes WP:NMUSIC better sources are needed though Atlantic306 (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Original nomination stems from a sock with an inaccurate reasoning. Work with artists and Nuru's label releases appears to meet #5 on the Musicians and ensembles Criteria. Arguably Criteria #1 as well. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind explaining? Also, please disclose if you been paid to put a vote here? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete has holding something at a notable label is not alone means for actual substance for establishing independent notability, my own searches have not found better; the article contains no other convincing claims there's an acceptable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 19:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My sweeps and this sweep didn't turn up much.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the recent Delete assertions, re-listing for more eyes... Lourdes 04:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 04:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see a single mention in any reliable independent sources. This is far from satisfying GNG. None of the singles released by the subject are notable. I don't see any evidence that the subject is notable and I would like the keep voters to clarify. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While having multiple releases from a major record label would allow her to pass musician guidelines, the subject seems to fall more under the lyricists/producer role. Her work in the careers of highly notable musicians, holding an executive position at a Sony owned label, and her professional association with Clive Davis seems more than notable. Shallownotthou (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You created your account just to vote on this AFD? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? I have voted in multiple AFD discussions. You seem to be rather hostile regarding the subject and going as far as to question other voters. I'm pretty sure that being bias is not within our guidelines. Other delete voters cast their opinions and went on without going after others. Shallownotthou (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A newly created account which votes on AFDs is quite suspicious. Additionally, you keep rationale doesn't make sense. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a WP:PROMO BLP lacking in reliable sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unless I misread, this, I do not see albums released by a major label. I see some EPs and singles in itunes. Anyway, being listed on itunes is not proof of anything, any more than being listed in Amazon. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.