Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bai Yupeng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bai Yupeng

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAD Stvbastian (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Stvbastian (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I feel awkward to repeat my comment, but can you apply some basic sense? Getting even a medal at the Grade 1 bwf tournament, is NO Joke, and it can only be your odd mentality to not recognize such successful junior players & nominate all of them for deletion? Sorry but seems like you got an Olympic medal yourself & tend to belittle the top bwf tournaments. Zoglophie (talk) 06:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing clearly does not rise to the level of GNG. I am beggining to think some editors views on GNG would justify them in creating an article on me.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend to amend the WP:NBAD, as rules needed to be revised with the time, not just sticking to them. User:Johnpacklambert, I may have created your article too if you had medalled in one of those tournament, but unfortunately you have not. I meant not to rude, just wanting to let you know that having highest junior medals is not what every player can achieve. Zoglophie (talk) 02:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Having a Wikipedia article is not a sign of merit. It is something that follows significant, sustained coverage in reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.