Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Answer (comics)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. no arguments for deletion MINUS the nom JForget 00:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional characters who fail WP:GNG - no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Google finds nothing adequate for either of them - [1], [2]. Furthermore per WP:MOSFICTION and WP:PLOT, this sort of excessive in-universe description is inappropriate. Claritas § 23:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There's a short article about the character in The Encyclopedia of Super Villains (New York, Facts On File Publications, pp 6-7).SPNic (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There needs to be significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources to substantiate notability. Claritas § 18:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per SPNic, although it would help if you would directly add such sources to the article. BOZ (talk) 05:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep due to sources from SPNic. Not sure if it's enough to WP:verifynotability but the article deserves some time before we figure out if it has the potential to meet baseline standards. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep A character from the Marvel Comics universe, all of which are notable by having Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four for cousins. Answer has even appeared in Spider-Man's books. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- Neutral - if there are sources, great, if not, delete, but the notion that every single character in the Marvel Universe is automatically notable because Spider-Man and the FF are notable is patently wrong and not a valid justification for keeping. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 04:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.