Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Majmudar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 18:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Majmudar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not a notable person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people). See: People notable for only one event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markraby (talk • contribs) 02:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject is the poet laureate of Ohio, which should fulfill criterion 1 of WP:AUTHOR "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." His writings have also been published in several legitimate poetry journals and have been reviewed by several credible sources like NPR and The New York Times so he should also meet the GNG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Qwaiiplayer Nexus000 (talk) 09:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Qwaiiplayer rationale. Meets WP:AUTHOR. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.