Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrijana Krasniqi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 01:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adrijana Krasniqi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician only famous for one event. She didn't qualify any further in Melodifestivalen and placed at the bottom of the scoreboard. Creating articles for every single contestant is absurd, and should be reserved for only the ones who're successful/have chart success with their songs. The article is weak as well as pretty much the only information there is about her has to do with Melodifestivalen. In the coming weeks, if Krasniqi experiences chart success with her song, then I'd say to recreate it, but for now I'd redirect to Melodifestivalen 2017. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:MUSIC second paragraph her music single has charted in the main Swedish chart. And it is sourced. Has particiated in Melodifestivalen. Has released previous music. Article has good third party sources. She signed with one of the worlds largest record labels well before participating in Melodifestivalen so obviously not only known for the festival, she also passes Paragraph 12 of WP:MUSIC --BabbaQ (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Her song has peaked in the chart since this AfD was initiated. It is sourced as well. Plus added international sources from both English and Albanian media. Obvious Keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Melodifestivalen 2017 is a sensible solution. Article as it currently stands does not have good, third party sources. Both sources are from SVT, and they are the sort of short articles any national TV broadcaster writes on song contest participants. Searching for sources I do not find anything that makes subject meet WP:BASIC. She is signed to Universal, but she has not yet released an album, and is not yet notable under any criterion in WP:MUSICBIO. No objections to a rewrite if and when her career takes off. — Sam Sailor 00:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Her song has peaked in the Swedish chart since this AfD was initiated and this !vote. It is sourced as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say that entering the chart at #62 exactly is "peaking". — Sam Sailor 22:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When a song enters a chart it peaks as Ss112 writes in his edit summaries. In week 1, it can peak again if it places even higher in week 2. But that is simply an expression. The main point being, she has music that has entered her countries main Chart list. She passes both paragraph 2 and 12 of WP:MUSIC. --BabbaQ (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: She's hit the charts, per BabbaQ, that meets the threshold for notability. Montanabw^(talk) 11:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per WP:MUSIC, as well as for the fact that she was a contestant in a major festival and that her songs have ranked in at least one major music chart in Sweden. --PootisHeavy (talk) 23:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: She is a charting artist signed with a majour label Universal Sweden. werldwayd (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 06:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.