Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:AIAV)
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 22:58 on 30 November 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    [edit]

    User-reported

    [edit]
    • Upd Edit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) –The user has been repeatedly engaging in edit warring on the Shahi Jama Masjid article, undoing edits made by multiple users without reaching consensus. Additionally, the user moved the article to an incorrect title, which can be seen as a form of vandalism. The user has only edited this single article and is attempting to add content that does not seem relevant to the article’s subject, violating notability and verifiability guidelines. Despite multiple reverts and warnings, the user continues to disrupt the article. Furthermore, instead of acknowledging their disruptive behavior, the user has issued a warning to me. This is an attempt to deflect responsibility and avoid constructive collaboration.
      Requesting to take necessary step- Cerium4B • Talk?