User talk:Zessede

January 2022

Your recent editing history at Buyeo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Esiymbro (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is absurd to claim the authenticity of the sources I have provided which are in fact reliable research journals, considering how much modern Chinese sources are aligned with the contentious Northeast Project that has received much criticism. The terminology of 'Fuyu' should not be on par with the other Korean terminologies as the Buyeo kingdom has no historical affiliation with China or Tungusic polities. And yet, despite my rebuttal referencing the work of Western and Korean scholars, you proceed on giving the block warning and undo my revisions without any edit summary. This is not a surprise though, considering how 'unbiased' you are and the fact you come from 'China', come to provide 'maintenance' to the Buyeo section 'objectively'. Since you proceed with blocking me, I might make a separate subdivision to shed light on this specific matter regarding the use of terminologies and its historical connection (legacy part) relating it with the Northeast Project. Zessede (talk) 12:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cores successor today?

I am Corea of Bone direct blood line my ancestor Antonio Corea was kidnapped in the 1500's from th Dynasty and sold into slavery when freed with his brother in Italia they re adopted their original last name Goryō bit because of language it was spelled Corea later later down my heritage Corea's move to Spain and North America the famous Indian man named Jeronimo is a direct descendant of Antonio Corea Bone last name is introduced to the Corea in 1800' when Jose De Jesus Bone marries into a Corea wife. 97.101.19.244 (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your recent editing history at Balhae shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 00:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

ミラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zessede reported by User:Esiymbro (Result: ). Thank you. Esiymbro (talk) 01:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Qiushufang (talk) 02:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your recent editing history at Goguryeo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Qiushufang (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term disruption and tendentious editing, including edit warring and making personal attacks on other editors (for context, see this discussion).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

22:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]