Jump to content

User talk:Truco/Archive 23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24

Welcome back!

Glad you decided to return early! Now get to work! By the way: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 23, 2009. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 10:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Those 2 FLC's

I replied to your comments yesterday, thanks.  iMatthew :  Chat  14:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Help

Hi, because my computer is gone weird I can't see wwe results (raw) Could you them just copy and paste them on my talk page?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.58.205.36 (talk) 13:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Your concerns have been addressed.--WillC 22:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I have addressed the issues you raised, thanks for taking the time to review the article. Let me know if you spot anything else. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 17:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009

The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.)
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here.

I see you're currently not busy, so I'm hoping that you could support or oppose my FLC nomination. Thanks and happy editing! -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 00:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Duffy discography

Thankyou for reviewing the above FLC. I was wondering whether all of your suggestions/comments had been addressed by myself, or if you had any more concerns about the way they were dealt with? Thanks! Dt128 09:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Am I still missing something here?

[1]  iMatthew :  Chat  (Review Me) 11:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2010

Hi, Can you put the last WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2010's image in the spanish page? Please.

Thank you. Alejandro Andrade Ponce —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.141.22.73 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 14:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

All your concerns have been addressed at the above FLC.--WillC 00:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Just thought to remind you that I fix the problems. If there anymore you would like fixed?--WillC 06:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments at the above FLC, it passed. Anyway, could you be apart of a discussion which I believe will happen? I'm trying to make it happen before all hell breaks loose. It is located at Talk:TNA X Division Championship. The guy who wanted the belt description removed is back again after his block and causing more problems. I would like to get some more opinions regrading his problems and see if he is correct.--WillC 03:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review

You replied to my editor review a while ago and suggested I use something called Twinkle to help with editing. I still can't figure out exactly what to do to get it up and running. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanksjondn (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


?

Your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dexter episodes/archive2 were solved days ago... Nergaal (talk) 23:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

All concerns have been addressed.--WillC 00:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Truco. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rumford Prize/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
So, do you have any opinion (Support/Oppose) on the article? ResMar 14:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Summary of records

There is now one. :)

Cliftonianthe orangey bit 16:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I've replied to all your issues. I'd appreciate it if you took another look to see if I adequately responded. Additionally, I have one or two requests for clarification. Mm40 (talk) 23:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Has that issue I wanted clarification on been fixed? Cheers. Mm40 (talk) 00:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q2 2009)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 4 — 2nd Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2009, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Re: Newsletter

I disagree. I think the current format works fine, it's logically laid out, and gives all relevant and necessary information that is of interest and/or pertinent to WP:PW members. Unless you can think of something we've left out, or something that is drastically wrong with the newsletter, changing it seems to be change for change's sake to me. ♥NiciVampireHeart15:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

While I see your point, the newsletter has always contained info about current events in wrestling, issue 1 for example, and I quite like it. I've personally found out info that I wouldn't normally have found out about from reading it in the newsletter. I just think that the section is too long, perhaps if we redefine what is notable, or even shorten down the info in it. For example, taking some info from the current issue, instead of saying "Beer Money, Inc. (Robert Roode and James Storm) defeated TNA World Tag Team Champions Team 3D (Brother Ray and Brother Devon) in a tag team match to win the titles." just say "Beer Money, Inc. (Robert Roode and James Storm) won the TNA World Tag Team Championship." That would cut it down a lot. There seems to be too much superfluous info imo. ♥NiciVampireHeart15:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Births, I don't think so really, and if we are adding them, then we've missed both Brock Lesnar's and Necro Butcher's, who both had kids a few weeks ago. So, just to clarify, we don't say if they got arrested, just that they got sentenced to prison? And regarding the Donald Trump thing, normally I'd agree for most storyline things, but this got coverage on a few other sites (non-wrestling ones) if I remember rightly, plus the trading of the 15 superstars as a result I think is notable enough to warrant a quick mention. Myabe remove the mention of McMhaon buying it back, but I think the tade should stay. Another thing from the newsletter, "TNA launched an online video subscription service." - I'm not sure how that is notable, we don't tend to list WWE launching abything like that. ♥NiciVampireHeart19:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
That makes sense. I agree. Yes, there has been loads of the news for the past two months or so. Hopefully things will slow down a little over the summer... ♥NiciVampireHeart08:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Wrestling Observer Newsletter Hall of Fame

Thanks for your helpful review. You caught a few things that slipped by me. I have replied to your comments. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re: SPAM

You've been hit with... Spam... *in the face*. ;) I'm good. How 'bout you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah, you've returned to your "misery". I guess, when you leave for a while, everything changes and then you forget what you once did. I've been there, no worries. :) So, is that all you're doing, right now? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Like, totally. :P That's good, you're going back to what you're good at. Go for it; return to your roots. If you need help, you know where to find me. ;) Same here, though, I haven't commented at PW, want to avoid that stuff, and haven't worked on a list. Just don't give away my secret. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
That's sad to hear. :( But, I remember you told me that. IDK, things still seem a bit shaky over there. I would rather comment when some consensus thing comes up, so I can say that I voiced my opinion. Hey, by any chance do you know how to add a message when someone hits "new section"? You know, when someone starts to open a new section a notice shows up? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll miss you. First LAX, now you. Its very sad. :( I guess. But, I want to avoid confrontations, really. Thanks for the link, I appreciate it. Will you work on something before leaving? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Well, I hope you will remember me when you're not on here. ;) What article do you have in mind? If you don't mind me asking. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Cause, I won't forget you. :) Bombtastic? How 'bout WM25? That was a powerful WrestleMania. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Exactly. You know the style, it would be an easy project for ya. :) Though, it is WM and you gotta get a lot of info. for it. I wouldn't be up for it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hell no.... Well, it depends. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

...the section I would have to work on. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Probably the Aftermath. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
It works for me in the future. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Ha! The big one. Man, there's no refs., so good luck on that. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, that makes sense. :) Need help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I think I remember Will saying something about working on the list. Not sure. What do you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Donkey Kong games FLC

It's been a few days, so I figured I'd drop a note on your talk page. The List of Donkey Kong games (Nomination) has gone through a copyedit by a third party which should address your concerns about periods in the article. Feel free to take a look over the nomination and to see if the changes in the article now meet your requirements. Cheers. -- Nomader (Talk) 18:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Ralph Bakshi filmography

I cleaned up the lead. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC))

Volunteer opportunity in Bethesda, Thursday, July 16

The Wikimedia Foundation will be conducting an all-day Academy at the National Institutes of Health, in Bethesda, Maryland, on Thursday, July 16. The team that will be teaching at the Academy, a mix of paid staff and volunteers, is looking for four more volunteers to be teaching assistants, providing one-to-one assistance in workshops whenever a workshop participant has a problem following the instructional directions. (We currently have two editors signed up as teaching assistants, and are looking for a total of six.)

The NIH editing workshops are only for two hours, but volunteers are asked to meet the Wikimedia Foundation team at the hotel in Bethesda at about 7:15 a.m. (time to be finalized shortly) and to stay for the entire day, which ends at 4:30 p.m. Lunch will be provided. (The full schedule can be found here.)

The team is not necessarily looking for expert editors (though they are welcome), just people who can help novices who might get stuck when trying to do some basic things. If you've been an editor for at least 3 months, and have done at least 500 edits, you probably qualify.

If you're interested, please send John Broughton an email. If you might be interested, but would like further information, please post a note on his user talk page, so that he can respond there, and others can see what was asked.

(You have received this posting because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland or DC. --EdwardsBot (talk) 03:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC))

Redirects

I know. I'm bored. So I'm trying to find something to do. And I found the templates. I'm making sure they all link correctly, are named correctly, and all champions have them in their articles.--WillC 04:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, plus it is a little more entertaining than being redundant and expanding an article or list.--WillC 04:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Well we have a problem. Take a look.--WillC 16:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

It is not even finished yet, so by the time I'm done it should be working all correctly. We could work together on it. You handle the lead and I'll handle the rest of the table and sorting which is really the hard part.--WillC 16:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

What is the difference? Let me rephrase, what is it that you were doing? Also, are you going to continue to oppose at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/MCW Heavyweight Championship/archive1? I'm just wondering.--WillC 16:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh. Well the reason it isn't sorting properly is because I stopped converting the table at reign 70 and I have yet to complete that. I do like the thing you are doing with the tv show names. I'll use that. Oh the prime championship thing? Yeah I linked it after you wrote that. I just thought you had the title watchlisted so I said nothing.--WillC 16:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

That really makes no sense. Why are they already in the article if only one actually happened? I counted around 140. Yeah, I'm up to it. If I'm not I'll let you know. I started on it around a month ago, but just stopped. I don't know why.--WillC 17:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
We can work on it together as well. It is really really fucked up. Missing information is the important one. I gave up on it for a bit, which lead to MCW Heavyweight Championship. The TV Champs is alot alike the NWA Belt. Contradictions everywhere. I would be glad to work on it with you as well.--WillC 01:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Find the dates for reigns, determine which episodes of what the title changes happened on, find enough reliable sources to determine these, the contradictions in the names the championship has went under, etc. The pre-NWA World TV Championship is where most of this occurs.--WillC 02:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about doing that, but I was searching for as many references as possible to find the dates first. I just got really busy and I tend to get busy at the wrong time.--WillC 03:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about searching through a few bios to see if anything popped up. I was hoping that The Hammer has wrote a book. I'm not sure though. Hopefully he has and tells when he won and lost his TV Title reigns. If not I was just going to end the reigns on the first day of the year and note it.--WillC 03:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, have you looked at WWE's WCCW DVD yet? I'm waiting for the Rise and Fall of WCW. That should help alot. But I can already see it, get ready for Wednesday Night Nitro coming 2010 right after Starrcade to air December 8, 2010, or whenever. Jim Cornette had done alot of interviews about WCCW, WCW, ECW, ROH, TNA, WWE/F, etc. In his ROH Straight Shooting DVD, he talks about WCCW, WCW, WWF, etc. Try to find a copy of that on the internet somewhere and see if has said anything.--WillC 03:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm joking. I would like to see the DVD but they don't have any of the meaningful WCW guys on it. Sting, Booker T, Cornette, Steiner, Nash, Jarrett, etc are all in TNA. Turner, EB, Goldberg, etc all did not comment on it either. Most it is just WWE guys a few WCW guys talking about WCW, so it is going to majorly one sided with Vince saying he was never afraid of WCW. True it will say nothing about it but once it comes out there should be alot of WCW articles popping out here and there on sites. Like the ECW DVD, there should be a Forever Hardcore type DVD show up as well. So we will get stories from guys like EB, Hogan, Nash, Sting, etc talking about WCW. Nice work with the tag. I watchlist all pages I go to so I see. Yeah, I'm working on alot of list. Just check my 100 subpages (it seems) to see what I'm doing.--WillC 04:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Exactly how?--WillC 18:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
No I understand. I tend to do that. After LAX, TJ, and a few others disappeared and didn't watch the TNA articles as much I kind of took over. So if there isn't alot watching a certain section I tend to start fixing everything. I'm trying to expand into that indy market where all the articles are very poor. Trying to get to the WCW and ECW stuff as well, though not until I get the TNA and ROH stuff finished first. Right now I'm trying to work my way up through TNA. Starting at the first show and working on all articles involved. I should have a crap load pop out soon.--WillC 18:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't have the time. I'm addicted to getting on here. I guess it is a get away from the drama I live. I whole to disappear once school starts. Not completely, just not as active. I also hope I finally find a job.--WillC 18:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Doubtful. Even I say I will leave, but I'm not actually going too. It is too adictive. Maybe not as much. But everyone pops in here and there.--WillC 18:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

We'll see. I tried to leave for a while an failed. Though before I do I'll probably raise alot of hell with the stuff I'm working on now and the drama it will bring I'm sure of. So hope by then you are gone.--WillC 18:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

This isn't the place it was a month ago. Things just change alot. Some want change, then some don't, then the ones who do want change don't anymore, and now the ones who didn't want it. Right now we have alot of GANs. That is good. But the problem is, alot of them have format problems that we need to discuss, but it seems some just don't want drama. Some just need to pull the stick out of their ass and grow up at the sametime.--WillC 18:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Well somewhat, but that was a needed change. We were writing incorrect according to the policies. Some just do not understand that we are in a period of reformation where everything is not going to be correct right off the bat. Discussions on the format is what will make it all correct. Something I tried to start, but failed proudly at, until I start it up again so that we can finish the reformation.--WillC 19:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Ha Obama. A fellow Democrat that will be shot one day. Kevin, I'll be done wiith Hardcore champions today just for you to know.--WillC

Nothing bad, I support Obama. I just see someone trying to kill him. There are too many racist in the US.--WillC 01:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Patheic. I can't wait for the amageddon. Maybe then we'll get along for a moment.--WillC 01:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Working on it. Talk:Abismo Negro/GA1 held me up a bit.--WillC 01:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm working on it now. I hope to have it ready today. Though my town is hosting a fun day so I may not have time.--WillC 17:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Alright.--WillC 18:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The Barnstar of The Great One

Hey, my friend Truco. How are you? Thank you for supporting me a lot and giving me a barnstar on my hard work, sourcing "The Great One" The Rock's article. Hey, man! Sorry, because I am remembering you after a very long time. I want to have a serious discussion with you. Recently, a new user named Zozca has started putting false blames on me that I'm a sockpuppet of [email protected]. I didn't know about this user until another user, JuJube also blamed me to be this user's sockpuppet, where I researched about this user. Well, now Zozca has started blaming me without any proof and I have talked to Jimbo about that. I am afraid that my account can be blocked anytime, so Truco, I request you to let me award this barnstar to my Stu.--Mark Linton (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Hmmm, interesting. Need help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Okay, okay. What you want me to do? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
½ the table? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The thing I used to do? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll do it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I'm gonna start, just letting you know, so we don't end up getting an "edit conflict", alright. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The one that starts with the Midnight Express? Yeah, I can work on it somewhere else. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I can do both WCW and NWA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I think I remember. So, the Steiners go first and then the vacant note? For the WCW. Use your example from your sandbox? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I will try to work all of that out. Also, I don't think I'll get to finish everything today, just wanted to let you know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, from the other lists, you wanted everything done fast. ;) Great, I gotta do math. Can you do the days held when I'm done? I don't feel like doing it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, old times. ;) Oh, okay then I'll just copy your coding. I forgot about the age in days template. Oops. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I totally get what you mean. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, sorry for me not working on the list. My internet was down for like 6 hrs., some damn hacker was messing with the connection. Okay, I will list "live event" if the source doesn't say list where the match took place. Thanks for the update. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Lazy ass. ;) I'm kidding. Okay, I'm done with WCW, but before you criticize it, let me be finish with NWA. Only fair. And then you can comment on it. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Damn, you quick. I'll finish NWA later today. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I forgot how excruciating these lists are. Are you serious? Damn it, more work. When I finish NWA I'll go through the list and see. Actually, since you're done, you can do WCW. And, I can fix any errors on NWA when I'm done. Is that cool with you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw your tweaks. I'll finish it, don't worry. I gotta do some equal work, I guess. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Dude, I'm so exhausted. Like, you have no idea. I think I'll have this finish by this weekend. Just, wanted to let you know and hope all is good. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Spooky. I was about to finish the list. ;) Um, I have limited time today, cause in a while I gotta go somewhere, so I guess you're gonna have to do WCW. Sorry. I know, I'm a bad person to collaborate on a list. But, I will get to the NWA part. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm done with NWA. Also, I looked at the source and everything listed there is correct. So, no changes necessary. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

USWA Tag Team titles

I came across your question to GCF about the USWA Tag TEam titles and well since I'm the only one I know of who actually owns the "Wrestling Titles History" book I figured I'd probably be able to give you the best possible answer. It's stated at the end of the WCWA World Tag Team Title history that they were renamed the USWA Tag Team titles and that the last team listed as the WCWA Tag Team champions were Scott Braddock & Cactus Jack Manson having won them on AUgust 4, 1989. The USWA section lists the first champions under the new name as Braddock & Jack with the same win date. I think that's conclusive documentation that the lineage was continued from the WCCW title to the USWA title (Technically it went WCCW=>WCWA=>USWA). Hope that helps. MPJ-DK (talk) 23:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Well there was the whole "Eric Embry wins control of the title and changes the name of the promotions" dealie, I think I've seen it mentioned in one of my books,I'll try and see what I can find. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

I've been looking, but I haven't been able to find anything yet. I'll definitely let you know if I do, though. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Tennis FLC

I have answered nearly all Dabomb's comments on the List of ATP number 1 ranked players so could you now take another look. 03md 19:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:List of tallest buildings and structures in Paris

Sounds great! I can probably get started on it tomorrow or Tuesday, if that works well with you.

Also, I have a quick favor to ask. I have been working on List of tallest buildings in Mobile as one of the final lists for the WP:SKY featured topic drive, but I am worried that it is too short. While there are lists with only 5 entries such as List of counties in Rhode Island, it seems as though many discographies have been removed for being "too short." Since you are a very experienced reviewer, could you look at it and see if you think its fails criterion 3b? Thanks! Cheers, Raime 03:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, do you think we could hold off with the Paris list until tomorrow (Tuesday) or Wednesday? I'd like to finish List of tallest buildings in Las Vegas first. Cheers, Raime 17:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

flc for guitar hero on tour series setlists

I've added the years to the last table per your suggestion. --MASEM (t) 13:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

List

Indeed, there she is. Nice work, man. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I know how much DYK?'s mean to you. :) Cool. I'll help you out in the FLC, if my help is needed. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
You'll do great, don't sweat it. Um, I'll try to do my best, and I think you'll be proud of me. :P I think. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Aw, that means a lot to me. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the know; I have added it to my watchlist. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I think so. Give me more details and I'll see what I can do. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I think I can do it. But, I won't get to it into tomorrow or in the weekend. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I can definitely get to it tomorrow. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You are welcome, mi amigo. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I haven't started yet. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
It took me a while to understand what you meant. ;) And no, I haven't forgotten. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Um, I kinda get what you mean, but kinda strugglin'. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay in replying to your comments. I e-mailed the hall to ask for some information about who runs it, but I haven't heard back. I found the name of the organizer, so I added it in, made some other fixes, and replied to all of your concerns. Thanks for the review, GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Created documentation. :D -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 00:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Please remember that rollback is only for "undoing blatantly unproductive edits, such as vandalism and nonsense" per WP:RBK. These edits [2], [3] do not fit this category in my opinion, they appear to be good faith attempts to improve the encyclopdia, and, as such, should not have been undone with rollback. Please remember this in future. Thanks, ♥NiciVampireHeart19:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, if it's a mistake like that it's fine. I just thought that you should know better, you've been here long enough. :) It's cool. ♥NiciVampireHeart19:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
No worries. ♥NiciVampireHeart19:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Truco. I've recently made all necessary changes or adjustments that you noted in your review of List of College of William & Mary people. I've left one question for you though, so could you please read the changes I've made and answer my question? I'd appreciate it much. Thanks for the input, and hopefully you'll support this as a FL in the near future. Jrcla2 02:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

NWA US Tag references

I can definitly confirm the existence of these five versions, if I thumbed through a couple of hundred pages I could even tell if you those are the only ones ;) but let's start with what we know, there were at least five versions and here are the chapter names & pages for ya. MPJ-DK (talk) 04:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

  • WWWF US Tag Team title - Chapter "United States: 19th century & widely defended titles - NWA, WWF, AWA, IWA, ECW, NWA", page 23
  • Florida version. 3 different histories piece together to form the history listed on Wiki
  • "Florida: NWA U.S. Tag Team title" - pages 157-158
  • "Florida: NWA U.S. Tag Team title" - page 162
  • "Florida: NWA U.S. Tag Team title" - page 163
  • Tri-State version: (should not be listed as "UWF" but NWA Tri-State that later became UWF) - "Louisiana/Oklahoma: NWA U.S. Tag Team Title" - page 232
  • JCP version - "United States: 19th century & widely defended titles - NWA, WWF, AWA, IWA, ECW, NWA", page 21
  • New Jersey - "New Jersey: NWA U.S: Tag Team Title" - Page 53

Evaluation of the Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics

Hi Truco! Could you say what should be done to make Evaluation of the Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics a Featured list? Felipe Menegaz 19:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you revisit? Several major sourcing issues have arisen, and your input would be valuable. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Update

I'm done with formatting the table here. There is still a bit of work to be done, such as sourcing, making sure everything is correct, small problems, etc. But thought to tell you that the table is finished in a way.--WillC 22:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

We have a problem. I can't find a source for the date of the first vacancy. I find a reason but no date.--WillC 01:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking of doing that, I was wondering if you found any date for it. The article gave the date February 8, 99, but I haven't seen anything give the date yet. Probably by tomorrow it will be your turn, since it shouldn't take me long to search through the table and fix what is left to fix.--WillC 01:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, we agreed on it. You wanted to do it, so best way to compromise.--WillC 03:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I'll do that.--WillC 04:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Something I thought to get your opinion on is the list is way too long in kilobytes. Before any actual refs have been added nor the List of combined reigns table, the article is at 75 kilobytes. We will probably have to do a list split, since the majority of the article has yet to be done to get it to FL. Any ideas?--WillC 05:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Well I was planning to add some extra citations. The error in the table is normal. I left it there since there is an error in the history, so I did that to keep my place so that I can sort that out.--WillC 21:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, well I thought to mention it. At 74 bilobytes, it is getting close to a split.--WillC 22:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I kind of figured that was the reason. I'll see about changing the table over to that format.--WillC 22:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm done. The history is correct. I'll just be finishing the coding, etc, nothing really important.--WillC 01:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I see. I'm in the process of looking for references and fixing coding. So, probably by the end of the week we should be done.--WillC 02:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you know if you, Gary, MPJ-DK, and me keep going at this speed, there will be no more articles to take to FL. All the mainstream lists are done and now we have to dig into the indies.--WillC 17:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Yo, it is all you buddy.--WillC 03:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Good. The mega amount of statistics I feel is unneeded but considering the situation regarding the title I feel they help more than hurt. How about changing the picture of Van Dam to one of Foley? Van Dam's pic has been used way too much in lists and other articles. I see the reason for it, but one of Foley would be better since he is the first champion and was awarded the belt. Something I meant to tell you was add in that Foley was awarded the belt in 03 and that it was revived in 06 with the whole ECW storyline. That is important, since it would be better to note Edge's unrecognized reign in the lead.--WillC 02:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Apparently because his success in hardcore wrestling, Vince awarded him the belt in 03.--WillC 02:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Well I found a few refs for the 2006 return, but the 03 presentation I have yet to find a ref for. Nothing in his Slam bio, though I'm looking through 2003 Raw results.--WillC 00:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC) The only problem is finding out which day he was given the belt.--WillC 01:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Probably will.--WillC 01:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, refs added. Do you see anything else that needs to be done?--WillC 08:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I was thinking of moving it into mainspace now, what do you think?--WillC 22:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

That format has never caused a problem before. We know the reign ended in February and had to end before the 14th. So either between 48 and 62 days it ended. You are welcome to change anything if you wish, this is just as much your project as it is mine.--WillC 01:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I believe you should since I don't understand the footnote coding and the way MPJ-DK does his thing. The table format is no different than usually. Just sorting templates, all the normal.--WillC 01:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, because one of the wrestlers who tied at 8 is number 9. The rank note should explain the reason. But lets say Raven and JBL are number 8, while Al Snow and Crash Holly are 10, well either Raven or JBL are number 8 while the other is number 9 then either Snow or Holly are number 10 while the other is number 11.--WillC 03:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I see. Interesting format, but I guess I'm pretty conservative. Don't change something if it isn't broken. I'm pretty much tired of expanding it any further, so how about we just place it in mainspace and I'll nominate it at FLC considering you have one up there already.--WillC 03:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I just went ahead and moved the article to mainspace seeing as it is done and any small problems can be taken care of there. So here it is, and here is the FLC nomination. Lets hope.--WillC 07:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree. Usually they are correct but in this case they are way off. The only problem is, the ref covers the locations. Like Raw, SD, and PPV events. Plus the days they aired. So I guess we could change it to an actual ref.--WillC 03:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

So what do you want to do? Keep it as general or turn it into a specific?--WillC 03:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'll note it. Yeah sure, no problem.--WillC 04:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem, happy and fine to do it.--WillC 01:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Sorry about that. I usually don't log in Saturday's. Um, if you do half, I can see your example and take it from there. Is that good for you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I thought I was doing or did something wrong. I was panicking, like you have no idea; 'He's mad, what did I do.' Thank God that's resolved. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, cool. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Dude, lists are complicated. ;) I've learned that the hard way. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, yes, poor me. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
You got that right. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Congrats, dude. Man, you're fast; I tried getting Daboom's queries, but you beat to it. ;) Oh, well. I guess you're faster than a speeding bullet. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Yup yup, another collaboration well done. You are, I've seen it... obviously. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. :) I was shocked when I got the message about the DYK. I was like 'I thought Truco said that he couldn't get a DYK.' But, at the same time I was like they probably got it wrong. But, I checked the name of the list twice and I was like I think they made a mistake with the list name. Cause, I don't remember any New Jersey title. So, to be sure, I did a check and there's my name and yours. So, thanks for including me in it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I remembered. I was reading your thread and I was like, 'Oh, okay.' Again, thanks for the include. ;) So, I hear you and Will are working on a list. How's the progress? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what Will told me and sent me the link to his sandbox to see the progress and told me that the two of you we're working on it. Your list looks good. But, why is confusing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I get what you mean. It is confusing. Are you going to take it to FLC? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I totally missed that. Good luck! --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I fixed all the problems that you identified in the article. At your leisure could you swing back by and let me know if there is anything else that needs to be corrected? --Kumioko (talk) 19:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Before you go on a holiday could you check and see if I addressed all of your concerns please. --Kumioko (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

WCW World Tag Team Title History

Why are you screwing with this page? If you knew anything about wrestling history, the NWA did not create any titles other then their World Heavyweight Title and the World Tag Team Title they created in 1992. All other NWA titles were created by the individual promoters. It's an established fact that Jim Crockett Jr. created the title in 1975, not the NWA.

I think Jaespinoza addressed your FLC comments, even though he didn't reply. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

The publishers are all unlinked, and I put in the alt text for the images. A couple of the Billboard links are down, but the website is changing all the locations of its pages so we just have to wait on that one. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

FL concerns

I really need some help with the columns on List of ATP number 1 ranked players. Do you know how to fix the problem? 03md 17:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm really sorry about not replying sooner. I didn't see your reply. I responded on the FLC page about images. Please let me know what you think. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you give the article and FLC another look? I've fixed roughly 95% of the issues you had, the only two remaining are really out of my control (Infobox Musician Awards doesn't have an alt text option, and the period in the references is how Cite Web is formatted). Staxringold talkcontribs 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK for NWA United States Tag Team Championship (New Jersey version)

Updated DYK query On July 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article NWA United States Tag Team Championship (New Jersey version), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 01:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey Truco, all of your concerns should have been addressed here. Do you think you can return to the FLC, and maybe participate in the discussion at the bottom about the page meeting 3b or not. iMatthew talk at 13:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

I believe I have resolved your comments there; please correct me if I am mistaken. Cheers, Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 14:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)