User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 9

Questions re: good article nomination

Hello TheNuggeteer, I saw that you nominated Piñon, Montrose County (probably soon to be retitled) for a Good article. I was wondering who gets credit for the good article if it passes? The reason I ask is that I did most of the work on it (77.4%) improving it and adding most of the content. Do you know how that works? Netherzone (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Netherzone: You could rightly claim it as a GA you significantly contributed to should it go through. If TheNuggeteer does much of the work replying to comments made in the GAN, then they would also be able to claim credit. GAs and FAs are perfect embodiments of the Wikipedia ideal that any achievement is a shared one! I hope that it goes through and you can both count on me if you need any help (even an article I'm still wary on deserves to be the best it can be!). ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @Pbritti, you are very kind. GA's are a total mystery to me. Shortly after I created Pueblo pottery several years ago, a couple editors said it could easily be a GA. The process was not formally started, but I do remember that I got intimidated by the pre-GA questions/issues on Talk:Pueblo pottery and gave up. While I like creating and editing articles, I have zero confidence in my writing ability (I'm a very visually-oriented person and struggle with writing.) I have to say, tho, that WP has helped me become a better writer! Netherzone (talk) 15:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Pbritti I am new to the GA process, Can you explain to me how Netherzone Can claim it as an article he significantly contributed to? TheNuggeteer (talk) 04:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

GA is an award an article receives, rather than an individual. If someone contributed significantly to a GA (particularly if they wrote most of the prose present at promotion), then that person can claim that they've helped with that GA even if they done shepherd the article through the nomination process. Netherzone wrote more than 2/3 of the Piñon article prose, so they'd definitely be able to claim a share of the credit. It’s a good thing to share credit and doesn't diminish anyone's contributions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Greetings TheNuggeteer, we are both new to the GA process. However I have a few DYKs and shared credit on one DYK with another editor and it was a great experience! Wikipedia is a collaborative project.

I want to further explain the reason for my inquiry, in visual terms. Here is a link to some pie charts that show our contributions: [1]. Scroll down to the Authorship pie chart: Netherzone 82.9%, TheNuggeteer 9.8%. The "Top 10 by added text" pie chart shows: Netherzone 77.4%, TheNuggeteer 15%. (The difference is due to the fact I also added several historical photographs). To further illustrate here is a link to the article when you submitted it to AfC: [2] and here is what it looked like after the improvements I made: [3]. Does that help?

Thankfully Pbritti is experienced with GAs, so we have an expert to ask if we have questions about the GA process/procedure as it unfolds. As I (think) I understand, both you and I and any other interested editor can continue to improve the article as it moves through the GA review process towards quality improvement, but we cannot review it ourselves. Netherzone (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Username: Kyaw-Van Draft-Hein Ko KO

Hello Dear Nuggeteer

My Draft page review is declined. Could you pls help for my Draft page edit. How to improve and edit my Draft because I need to publish my Draft. Pls kindly help me ..@TheNuggeteer

Kyaw-Van (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Kyaw-Van: Can you try to find more sources? I'm also going to try to find more sources too. TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I can't find any news articles of him, if you can find any news articles mentioning him, make sure it's mostly talking about him. TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello Dear @TheNuggeteer, do you need which more sources? I added his information completely . But If you need, could you show me as sample? Kyaw-Van (talk) 07:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Kyaw-Van Sorry for the late reply, but how do you know all of this information without citing any sources? Do you know him personally.
Anyway, about the issues, I can't find any sources about him (except unreliable sources) making him not notable by the General Notability Guideline, If you can find any sources, (websites/pages about him), put the URL in your reply, I can cite the source on the article. TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I know him he is Youth Tech Entrepreneur in Myanmar.

His Website is here https://www.heinkoko.com/

Pls help me for that Dear. Thanks so much Kyaw-Van (talk) 08:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Do you know him personally? TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

1918 Celebes Sea earthquake

Hi TheNuggeteer, thanks for your work on this earthquake article. It's been on my list to expand for a while, in fact pretty much since I created the stub. Your expansion gave me the push necessary to add more content. Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the DCWC!

See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, TheNuggeteer! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

GA on Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics

Hey! Thanks for the GA on the article I worked on, just surprised that the review's so short. You sure there aren't any comments? Arconning (talk) 05:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, why? TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Just noticed that you've been promoting GA articles a lot today, like around three? Just a suggestion, next time you review an article just add some comments once in a while even if you believe that the article is ready as a GA. Arconning (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay; TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations#Questionable_reviews. Arconning, just "add[ing] some comments" isn't really going to cut it and seems to mock the process. Drmies (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies Just tried to summarize it as short as possible as I was in a bit of a rush, my apologies. An article can be passed immediately without any changes but they should still have some sort of commentary that's substantial. I discussed this in the Discord server and a review that Epicgenius thought of was Talk:Surrogate's Courthouse/GA1, which would be better in this case. Arconning (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

About your recent GAN reviews

Hey TheNuggeteer, I'm one of the coordinators for the DCWC, in which you submitted a few GAN reviews earlier. Per the discussion above and at the GAN talk page, I will be declining your submissions for eligibility. I'm sorry to see that the start of the contest has been so rough on you! However, I don't think this should discourage you from future content reviews. I can see you've accumulated some good experience in the last couple of months in your capacities as an Articles for creation and new pages reviewer, and I can understand that the jump in time required for those and a GAN review can be challenging. While your reviews may not meet community expectations, I don't believe you were making them in bad faith, and you can take this opportunity to make use of available resources to improve your GAN reviewing. You may be interested in a GAN mentorship, where an experienced content reviewer will help guide you through the process. I'd also recommend going through some GAN reviews conducted by skilled reviewers and learning from their examples; one of them seems to already be linked above. I'm also happy to answer any other questions you have. Good luck, and I look forward to seeing more submissions from you in the DCWC in the future! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

2023 visit by Rodrigo Duterte to China moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 visit by Rodrigo Duterte to China. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lahug Airport

Hello! Your submission of Lahug Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SounderBruce 01:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Outline of Cebu

Hello TheNuggeteer, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Outline of Cebu, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Cebu.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piñon, Colorado

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piñon, Colorado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime

The article Afrique Victime you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Afrique Victime for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PerfectSoundWhatever -- PerfectSoundWhatever (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Typhoon Ewiniar (2024)

Hi -- I've left a note at the Piñon, Colorado review about drive-by nominations, so I had a look at your other GA nominations to make sure it wasn't an issue there as well. For Typhoon Ewiniar (2024), you're a minor contributor; I think you need to post at the talk page and ask others if they think it's ready for GA and if anyone else wants to nominate. It's polite to agree among the active editors on the page who will actually nominate. If you prefer, you can just remove the nomination, or I can. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi again -- can you let me know what you want to do here? I don't want to just remove the nomination without hearing from you. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

@Mike Christie Sorry for the late reply, I messaged the talk page of the main contributor HurricaneEdgar, I'm going to wait for his response. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Good idea; I added a bit of explanation to your note. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

And I went ahead and posted a note to the article talk page too, since there are a couple of other editors who are also significant contributors, in case they want to weigh in. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Morden (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Morden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, TheNuggeteer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marcelino Libanan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marcelino Libanan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Morden (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Morden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marcelino Libanan

The article Marcelino Libanan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Marcelino Libanan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Backlog elimination drive 2024

Hi! I noticed that two of the articles in your totals list marked as "completed" still have the copy edit template. I just wanted to let you know in case you missed it! The articles are: 2018 Brazil truck drivers' strike and Sam Nunn. Kind regards, Pinecone23 (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

@Pinecone23 Thank you for letting me notice! I removed both of the templates from both of the articles.

Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Happy copy editing! :-) Pinecone23 (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piñon, Colorado

The article Piñon, Colorado you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Piñon, Colorado for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

See

Hello, can you review this article and add a mark to it that it has been reviewed to appear in the public? Thank you in advance. The article has reliable sources that you can search for and verify.Aymen Hasan Dawood DRsabire (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Poleteismo

Hello! Your submission of Poleteismo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 9

Nomination of List of English words or terms that have been trademarked or copyrighted for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of English words or terms that have been trademarked or copyrighted is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English words or terms that have been trademarked or copyrighted until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Whpq (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)