User talk:Rsocol

Welcome

Hello, Rsocol, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kuru ^talk 05:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! --Eliade 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet

Well, articles consistently seem to feature lists of ministers either to the article for the prime-minister (Léon Blum, Camille Chautemps) or, for the current one, an article referring either to the Prime Minister or an extensive one about the institution (such as the link you provided). I believe that the only exceptions for historical cabinets are when the latter do not fit into articles for leading persons because of the latters' length (William Pitt the Younger). It would be senseless to have an article that will become obsolete in, at best, a couple of years, when the reader could have all the info linked to a relevant page. Plus, you will note that the Cabinet in Romania is not exactly a traditional institution like the Cabinet in the UK is (by which I mean: in Romania, the cabinet seems to identify with the PM, who was never the lord with the most important job in a kingly council). Dahn 10:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring

Thanks for restoring the part I accidently deleted. Must be the Firefox browser. I read that it might do such things like cutting off text, but I didn't realize that it had just happened to me. I'll try to be more careful next time. Thanks again.

About that webcam link: I thought it might be more accessible and useful at the top of the page, but the external links section will also do.

Bye and have a nice evening!

Rubobostes

Re : Please delete the redirects, too

Done. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 09:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the translation words

And I think the Romanian 'hram' can be very well replaced by Patron Saint.

IonIonescu 13:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:4months3weeks&2days poster.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:4months3weeks&2days poster.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that someone found a newer poster (also non-free) for the 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days movie. As it seems to be newer, I see no reason to replace that image with the one I uploaded. There is no other article where this picture can be used, so I do not object to the deletion. Razvan Socol (talk) 07:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deleted fair-use image

Hi! The short version is that since Cătălin Predoiu is still alive, it's possible for a replacement image to be created (the rule is WP:NFCC #1 I believe). I know the rules suck, but it does serve a purpose: to give people a motivation to go out and make free content. Please get back to me if you have any other concerns. east.718 at 06:47, March 5, 2008

Actually, it's very easy to obtain free media - another avenue you can take is by asking Predoiu himself to donate an image under a free license. I've uploaded around 125 free images so far here, the vast majority of which weren't found, but rather released freely after I asked the copyright holder nicely. east.718 at 21:23, March 5, 2008

Gheorghe Argeşanu and other images

Considering that there are currently three other images of the man in the article, and that the image is added is clearly and thoroughly copyrighted, how do you suppose "fair use" applies? If you read the tag you added, you'll perhaps notice this line: "Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information." They're nice images, but you may want to consider that using such liberal interpretations of fair use may be considered disruption. Also, the images are not low-resolution under any definition. If you're ignoring the guidelines and gaming the system just because they're "better images" (they are, but how does that begin to matter in a copyright-related issue?), then you risk being seen as a disruptive editor - which I for one am sure you're not. Dahn (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the faulty rationales used for the other images are an equivalent issue. I wouldn't know how to pick at them, but for now this was easiest. For example, I still have no idea about how and when the "photo taken while in the exercise of his functions" applies to Romanian PD, if it exists at all, and I have no idea how one assesses that. Cheers, Dahn (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rsocol! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 16 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sebastian Vlădescu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alexandru Vaida Voievod.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alexandru Vaida Voievod.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of confirmation that the other images are PD, I would say add a detailed Fair Use Rationale with reference to WP:NFCC and give as much information as you can Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:John Phillips (photographer).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:John Phillips (photographer).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArgumentOutOfRangeException in ArticleTextBox.PasteUnformatted

This bug has already been fixed. Please download the latest snapshot from http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't know there was another place to download AWB except http://sourceforge.net/projects/autowikibrowser/, but I see that it's mentioned on the Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser page. Thanks again, Razvan Socol (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alfred Toepfer Stiftung F.V.S

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alfred Toepfer Stiftung F.V.S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 19:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was a mistake; the interwiki link should have been added to Alfred Toepfer Stiftung F.V.S.; the page Alfred Toepfer Stiftung F.V.S should be deleted. Razvan Socol (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

de

See reply on my talk page. — AdiJapan 15:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Aspect din timpul ceremonialului 2.jpg

Salut!

Eu am luat poza asta mai de mult de pe situl MAPN, impreuna cu (multe) altele. La un moment dat am intrebat pe e-mail daca pot fi folosite, si raspunsula fost (in rezumat) "da, cu mentionarea sursei". Binenteles ca anii au trecut si eu nu mai am acel raspuns al lor.

As sugera crearea unui sablon de copyright cum este [Template:PD-RO-exempt] pentru fotografii facute de fotografii institutiilor publice, care sunt sub aceeasi regula: pot fi folosite cu scop necomercial (informativ) cu mentionarea sursei; sa zicem PDRomania-Gov-photo? Sugerez si nu fac eu insumi asa ceva, pentru ca nu sunt tocmai un expert in ale treburilor astora. --ES Vic (talk) 10:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Fobos-Grunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 10:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. When you recently edited MTV Romania Music Awards 2005, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motive (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited Adriana Villagran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Slam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, Rsocol, for digging into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octavian David Constantinescu. I felt it was a hoax but couldn't demonstrate it until you pulled up the copied photo. Your help was really appreciated there. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tsar movie poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tsar movie poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file was used in the Tsar (film) article, but the usage was not shown on the page of the file, probably due to a bug. The problem was corrected with a null edit in the article page. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:36, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Distinguish "work" and "publisher"

Hi.

Thanks for fix. But please take care when specifying |work= and |publisher=. ZDNet always go to |work= (or |website= if you prefer this alias). Publisher is CBS Interactive.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Holograf

Am dezvoltat pagina, dacă găseam și referințe de la sursă pentru vânzări ar fi fost perfect. Ala Narky Blert se crede mare incluzionist si mai vine cu niste motive absurde.Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Să mai intervii dacă o să fie nevoie, ăștia se leagă de toate chichițele.Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rsocol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cătălina Cristea

Are you able to add WP:INLINECITED sources for this? All blps need them, and at the moment it's not easy for a reader to see where you got your info. Thanks for creating the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher vs. website name

Hey there. You might wanna be a bit more careful when filling citation information. In you contribution to Windows 10, you had mistakenly put the website name into |publisher=. The Verge is a website; its publisher is Vox Media. Actually, it is easy: If a name has .com at the end, it is probably a website name, not a publisher name. Happy editing! ;) FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 06:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rsocol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rsocol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Mihai.zamfir30 in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Buna ziua !

Dvs. sunteti acesta? https://ro.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:Rsocol daca da, as vrea sa discut ceva cu dvs, asa ca va rog sa-mi spuneti unde e mai ok: aici sau pe email. Va multumesc ! RAMSES$44932 (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dacă e legat de Wikipedia și nu e nimic secret, aș prefera să discutăm aici (sau la ro.wiki), nu pe email. Dacă e ceva confidențial, vă rog să-mi trimiteți un email prin pagina https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Rsocol. Mulțumesc, Razvan Socol (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Românii au talent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I fixed it now. Razvan Socol (talk) 07:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]