User talk:Red-tailed hawk
Red-tailed hawk is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened
[edit]You offered a statement in an arbitration enforcement referral. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust đŹ 06:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Temp userpage redirect
[edit]I see that you have created a redirect at Draft:Temp userpage pointing to User talk:CFA. I see no reason for that redirect to exist, so you may be able to apply WP:G7 to it. GTrang (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that catch; didnât mean to leave that behind when I moved the userâs talk page back to its appropriate place. â Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 17:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: Thank you for leaving the note. I notice that you didn't specify a particular article above, so I tried to figure out which edits this was referring to. I went through your recent contributions for a hint, and I noticed that you had been tagging some FAO documents in Non-communicable disease, Food system, Agrifood systems, and True cost accounting. I recall having encountered the FAO sources in my capacity as a VRT agent (for example, in this discussion from 2022), but looking through the history of those four articles, I don't appear to have edited any of them. Did you mean to send your notification here and, if so, can you point out the articles that caught your attention? â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry about that. It's hard to keep up with CopyPatrol some days, so I maybe over-rely on template notifications! There were four articles: True cost accounting, Agrifood systems, Food system, and Non-communicable disease. Content was copied from the FAO paper "In Brief to The State of Food and Agriculture 2024. Value-driven transformation of agrifood systems". The thing to do is to include the template
{{Creative Commons text attribution notice|cc=by4|from this source=yes}}
as part of your citation. Like this. Diannaa (talk) 13:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)- Hi again. So, looking at the copypatrol, the entries you reviewed were this one from True cost accounting, this one from Agrifood systems, this one from Food system, and this one from non-communicable disease. I did not make any of those edits, and I have not edited any of those pages.
- Again, @Diannaa: Are you sure that you meant to leave the template warning on this user talk page, and not, say, the talk page of the user who made the edits that had the CC attribution issues? â Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 15:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah no. I have sent the message to the wrong user for some reason. Sorry for the mistake. Diannaa (talk) 00:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry about that. It's hard to keep up with CopyPatrol some days, so I maybe over-rely on template notifications! There were four articles: True cost accounting, Agrifood systems, Food system, and Non-communicable disease. Content was copied from the FAO paper "In Brief to The State of Food and Agriculture 2024. Value-driven transformation of agrifood systems". The thing to do is to include the template
You've got mail
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Doug Weller talk 10:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Received. Looks like Bish has taken care of it. â Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates
[edit]You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA
. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:
First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.
Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk â˘Â he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
[edit]Hello Red-tailed hawk: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)